Corrosion data using Electrochemistry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a lab experiment designed to investigate the effect of electrolyte pH on the corrosion rate of iron in an electrochemical process. The experiment involves using a galvanostatic setup with a known weight of iron as the anode, measuring weight loss over 2-3 hours. A significant concern arises regarding the potential difference measured in the lab, which is 6-7 V, compared to the 3-4 V observed in the industrial plant. This discrepancy raises questions about whether the lab conditions accurately reflect those of the plant, potentially leading to different corrosion and passivity reactions. It is emphasized that both the potential difference and current density in the lab should match those in the plant to ensure valid comparisons. Additionally, clarification is sought regarding the actual potential difference between the working and counter electrodes in the lab setup, indicating a need for a better understanding of the electrochemical configuration being used.
Sgta
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am a Chemical Engineer but a novice in electrochemistry; hence the query might sound very basic to everyone.

We have an industrial electrochemical process (With Iron anode) and we are conducting a lab experiment to understand what is the effect of electrolyte pH on corrosion rate of Iron (this will include corrosion + electrochemical dissolution). The experiment involves using electrolyte at different pH values galvanostatically in a stirred cell (using a potentiostat) on a known weight of Fe electrode and measuring the weight loss after a period of 2-3 hours of galvanostatic operation. The working electrode in the lab is of course, the Anode (Fe).

My issue relates to the potential being measured in the lab. In our plant, the potential difference between our electrodes is between 3-4 V. In the lab experiment, the potential measured by the reference electrode is close to 6-7 V.

This makes me question :
a) Is our lab experiment at all happening under the same conditions as the plant? Since the potential is different, the corrosion/passivity reactions occurring on the lab Fe electrode might be very different from the plant.
b) If a) is right, do I need to ensure that the voltage in the lab stirred cell is close to the voltage in the plant.

Thanks,
Sgta
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You need these potentials to be identical, no doubt about it. Actually to be sure you should work on having both potential difference and current density (A/cm2) similar to the production set up.
 
Thanks Borek. I agree with your current density point too and are working towards it. Another question: 3-4 V is the potential difference between our electrode whereas 6-7 V is the potential measured for the working electrode i.e. it is the difference between the Anode and the solution. This means that the actual potential difference between the working and counter electrode in the lab is higher than 7 V. Is that right ?
 
Sorry, but I have problems following your description. In the electrochemistry world that I worked for a short time over 20 years ago we often used three electrodes setup:

- working electrode (be it anode or cathode, that depends on the system researched)

- reference electrode (one that is used to measure the potential of the working electrode)

- counter electrode (AKA auxiliary electrode) which is just a current sink - reference electrode is way too delicate to survive huge currents.

I am not sure I am able to translate your system to this one.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top