Could a major solar flare knock out nuclear reactor safety?

fellupahill
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
I live in AZ so besides the "bubla" or whatever that stupid name is for a huge wall of dust we get that's crazy huge is about as bad as our weather gets. Basically Solar Flairs are the biggest threat to me and my dog, so its my the natural disaster of choice when thinking about different apocalyptic scenarios.

I was just reading the article in SA about fukushima and if a similar situation could ever arise in the US; Seems like all their backup plans and pretty much the safety of anyone near a Nuclear Power Plant (Like me and Palo Verde) goes out the window if a major solar flair hits the Earth and knocks out all the electronics. Please tell me I am ill-informed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Basically Solar Flairs are the biggest threat to me and my dog
What? How? I'm pretty sure you and your dog are still at greater risk of death by heart disease or motor vehicle than from solar flares.
pretty much the safety of anyone near a Nuclear Power Plant (Like me and Palo Verde) goes out the window if a major solar flair hits the Earth and knocks out all the electronics
... you may want to have a go working out how big a solar flare would have to be to knock out anything. There are a great many flares every year and the most we ever get is disruption to communications because of the interaction with the Earth's atmosphere.

March 8 saw one of the bigger events and that had almost no effect on us.
http://www.voanews.com/english/news...olar-Storm-Bears-Down-on-Earth-141901243.html
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top