Could Mass and Radius Changes Have Caused a Shift in Earth's Gravity?

AI Thread Summary
A change in Earth's gravity to 9.9 m/s² suggests alterations in either the mass or radius of the planet. Increasing Earth's mass or radius could lead to higher surface gravity, while decreasing either would lower it. The law of gravitation indicates that if the radius increases without a mass change, gravity decreases. Conversely, to achieve a higher surface gravity, one must consider the necessary adjustments to mass and radius. Ultimately, the discussion revolves around the combinations of changes in mass and radius that could result in increased surface acceleration.
Brittykitty
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
If the acceleration due to gravity changed to 9.9 m/s2, what possibly could have happened to the mass of Earth (Me) and/or the radius of Earth (re)?

My answer is that the mass and radius would increase?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about how the law of gravitation relates surface acceleration with surface radius and planet mass. If you were to increase the surface radius of the Earth without changing its mass would surface gravity then increase or decrease?
 
It would decrease?
 
Indeed. If you still are in doubt if your first answer was (fully) correct, then try look at the equation and think about what you have to do to the mass (but with constant radius) to increase the surface gravity, and likewise what you have to do to the radius (but with constant mass) for the same to happen again. You may also think about if it is possible to achieve the higher level of surface gravity if both mass and radius had increased or if both had decreased at the same time. After all that the answer to the original question would then simply be a list of all the combinations of increase, constant and decrease of mass and radius that allow a higher surface acceleration to be achieved.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top