Couldn't understand the way the problem is solved regarding resistivit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ein Krieger
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the cross-sectional area and length of a wire during the process of wire drawing, where the volume of the wire remains constant. Reducing the cross-sectional area indeed increases the length of the wire, as the mass must remain constant according to the formula for mass (mass = density × volume). The confusion arises from the assumption that a reduction in area only affects the radius, while in reality, it also necessitates a proportional increase in length. The key takeaway is that as the cross-sectional area decreases, the length of the wire must increase to maintain a constant volume. Understanding this relationship clarifies the problem regarding resistivity and wire dimensions.
Ein Krieger
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was observing the solution of the following problem below:

765fa3055a66.png


Below it says that reducing the cross-sectional area of the wire triples its length. However, according to cross-sectional area equation A=pi*r^2 we observe that reduction of area only leads to reduction of radius .

Is there a mistake or I have some gaps in knowledge regarding above mentioned relationship?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It says the wire is drawn out to reduce it cross section area. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire_drawing if you don't know what "wire drawing" means.

Assume the volume of the wire is constant. As you reduce the cross section area, you increase the length.
 
In the original configuration there is some fixed mass of wire. After stretching will there not be the same mass of wire? You need to make the wire longer to compensate for the loss in radius.

The wires mass before+
mass= ρ*Volume. the volume = A*L
so
Mass = ρAL

I will now let you find the length after stretching.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top