Coulomb's Law and insulating fiber

AI Thread Summary
Coulomb's Law is applied to a scenario involving a fixed charge and a bead that floats due to the balance of electric and gravitational forces. The charge Qa is -3 µC, and the bead's mass is 170 g, with its equilibrium position at 16 cm above the origin. The discussion reveals an error in unit conversion, as the charge should be expressed in Coulombs rather than microCoulombs. The calculations show that the Coulomb force must equal the gravitational force for equilibrium, leading to a derived charge Qb of approximately 1.58 nC. Clarification on unit consistency and signs is crucial for accurate problem-solving in electrostatics.
nahya
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
A rigid, insulating fiber runs along a portion of the y-axis; the fiber isnot free to move. Gravity acts downward (g = 9.81 m/s2).A charge Qa = -3 µC is fixed to the fiber at the origin. A bead with a hole drilled through its center is slipped over the fiber andis free to move along the fiber without friction. The mass of the bead is m = 170 gand its charge is Qb. At equilibrium, the bead floats a distanceyb = 16 cm above the origin.
---
the coulomb force must balance the gravitational force, so..
the answer is in C, not µC, so Q(a) = 0.003 C.
K * 0.003* Q(b) / 0.16^2 = 9.81 * 0.17
solving for Q(b), i get 1.581226667e-9.
i checked my solution, and it did equal to the gravitational force.
what am i doing wrong?
am i miscomprehending the problem, or the coulomb's law?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
check your units and signs,

0.003C \neq -3 \mu C

(there are two things that need to be changed to make this an equallity)
 
Last edited:
doh!
thanks. hehe.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top