Coulomb's Law - Vector Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem using Coulomb's Law and vector analysis. The user is unsure about the correct angles in their free body diagram (FBD) and seeks clarification on their approach. It is clarified that angle x is not simply 37 or 53 degrees, but rather needs to be determined through the components of the forces involved. The recommended method is to break down the force vectors into horizontal and vertical components to find the net force vector. The user acknowledges their confusion but appreciates the guidance on how to proceed with the calculations.
mrxtothaz
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've taken the liberty to translate the problem, along with its corresponding diagram, into an image:

http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/9695/questionm.jpg

angle q1 = 53*
angle q2 = 37*
angle q3 = 90*

Homework Equations



F21 = kq1q2/(r21)^2
F31 = kq1q3/(r31)^2
Sine Law

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I have a good idea on how to solve this problem. First, here is my vector FBD:

http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/5599/vectorw.jpg

I'm not sure if I did it properly. The other issue is I'm not sure whether the angle x is 37 or 53 degrees. My personal take on it is that it is 53 degrees, because vector F21 is drawn at 37 degrees; because that 37 degrees isn't in the triangle, I believe the only way to get an angle is to consider the angle 53 (complimentary angle). But because of this, I am second-guessing whether my FBD is right in the first place or if I am wrong to infer the angle that way.

Secondly, I have calculated:

F21 = 2.7x10^-23 N
F32 = 8.8x10^-23 N

So, my approach to this problem is to apply the sine law (as soon as I can determine angle x) to get all the angles within the triangle and then to get a magnitude for the net force vector.

So:
1. Is my vector FBD correct?
2. Is my inference of angle x correct?
3. Is my approach to the problem sound?

I'll appreciate any help I can get.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Your vector diagram looks fine.

2. Angle x is actually neither 53 nor 37 degrees. The angle between F21 and the horizontal direction is 53 degrees, and the angle between F21 and the vertical direction is 37 degrees, as you could easily tell from the triangle in the original problem. But your angle x is the angle between F21 and the resultant force, which is neither horizontal nor vertical.

3. You could do the problem this way, but you'd have to start by figuring out angle y rather than x. You don't have enough information to figure out x until you've actually solved the problem. But that's not the way I'd do it. Instead, I would split each of the two individual force vectors into horizontal and vertical components, add up the components, and compute the magnitude and direction of the final vector from that.
 
diazona said:
You could do the problem this way, but you'd have to start by figuring out angle y rather than x. You don't have enough information to figure out x until you've actually solved the problem.

Yeah. I understand that to find Fnet, I need to figure out angle y, but given that I was so inclined toward a trigonometric solution, not being able to find x just made the whole problem a non-starter for me. I didn't know how to rationalize getting an angle for the diagram, so thank you for setting me on the right course.

diazona said:
But that's not the way I'd do it. Instead, I would split each of the two individual force vectors into horizontal and vertical components, add up the components, and compute the magnitude and direction of the final vector from that.

I'm kind of rusty with vector analysis, so let me see if I can put this together correctly:

Fx=F21cos37 + F31cos90
Fy=F21sin37 + F31sin90
where,
Fnet2= Fx2 + Fy2

Does that look about right?
 
Yeah, that looks about right, if you have the positive x direction going to the left. If you wanted positive x going to the right, as is typical, you'd just need to use a negative sign, Fx = -F21 cos 37o - F31 cos 90o.


Although technically, none of those F's you wrote (except perhaps the Fnet) should be bold, since you're referring to components, not full vectors.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top