• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Coulomb's law vector question.

  • Thread starter mad
  • Start date

mad

65
0
Hello, I have a simple exercice I'm having trouble to solve.

So we have a) and b)

a) asked the force applied on a charge.... and the answer was [tex] \vec{F_{res}.}= Qkq ( -0,222 \vec{i} -0,250\vec{j}) N [/tex]
that's not a problem here.. that was the good answer. Now in b), they're asking where do they have to put a +2,5Q charge to nullify the force exerced.. so I thought yeah really simple, the force just has to be the inverse:

[tex] \vec{F_{12}}= Qkq ( 0,222 \vec{i} + 0,250\vec{j}) N [/tex]

and since [tex] \vec{F_{12}}= \frac{2,5Qkq}{r^2_{21}} \vec{u_{21}} [/tex]

then I just have to equal this last equation to the 2nd to last one, and I equal the [tex] \vec{i} [/tex] and [tex] \vec{j} [/tex] vectors in both ones to find out the vector of where the charge should be placed to nullify the force applied on it, but I'm having trouble finding it. Believe me, I have tried more than 10 times, and I can't find the vector. Can someone please help me on this one?

thanks a lot!
 
Last edited:

quasar987

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,771
7
[tex]\vec{F_{12}}= \frac{2,5Qkq}{r^2_{21}} \vec{u_{21}} [/tex]

can also be written as

[tex]\vec{F_{12}}= \frac{2,5Qkq}{|\vec{r_{21}}|^3} \vec{r_{21}} [/tex]
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,950
532
If you want help,then u have to help us too:the only way to do that is to post the ORIGINAL TEXT OF THE PROBLEM...

Daniel.
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,950
532
And BTW:if that N at the right of your first equation is what i think it is,then learn that VECTORS DO NOT HAVE "SI" UNITS...

Besides,even if it were a scalar,you should have used the traditional notation
[itex] [unit] [/itex]

Daniel.
 
607
0
Please give a description of the first part. Like:
Is there another particle that causes this first force?
Is q the charge on the main particle? Is it positive?
If these are right then lets look at it as: (sorry im not goot at latex)
charge 1 = main particle
charge 2 = causes force in part a
charge 3 is the 2.5Q charge

Force on 1 due to 2:
kqQ*(u12)/(r12)^2

Force on 1 due to 3:
kq(2.5Q)*(u13)/(r13)^2

They must sum to zero
cancel kqQ

(u12)/(r12)^2 = -2.5*(u13)/(r13)^2

since we know its on the other side, the unit vector would be the negative of the previous
u12=-u13
1/(r12)^2 = 2.5/(r13)^2

so r13=sqrt(2.5)*r12

The unit vector of the first is (-0.664i-0.748j) with the magnitude of 0.334 (u=r/|r|)

so r13=sqrt(2.5)*(0.334)=0.528

So the vector is magnitude*(0.664i+0.748j) = 0.351i+0.395j

Thats what I get, but im not very confident in my skills.
 
Last edited:

mad

65
0
dextercioby said:
And BTW:if that N at the right of your first equation is what i think it is,then learn that VECTORS DO NOT HAVE "SI" UNITS...
Daniel.
A force has a unit, Newtons, that's why I posted the N.It has a force in a direction i and j.

Healey01, thanks for the help but that's not the answer.

The question was there's two charge that create a force (the first one I posted) on another charge. They then add a 2,5Q charge and ask where to put it in order to nullify the force applied on the charge..
Thanks for everyone that helped, and I hope someone can figure this out...
 

mad

65
0
quasar987 said:
[tex]\vec{F_{12}}= \frac{2,5Qkq}{r^2_{21}} \vec{u_{21}} [/tex]

can also be written as

[tex]\vec{F_{12}}= \frac{2,5Qkq}{|\vec{r_{21}}|^3} \vec{r_{21}} [/tex]
Yes, that's how I started the problem, but it gives me a wrong answer..
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,950
532
mad said:
A force has a unit, Newtons, that's why I posted the N.It has a force in a direction i and j.
A SCALAR YES,but A VECTOR NO...
[tex] F_{x}=... [N] [/tex]
and similar for F_{y} woud have been the correct formulas...

Daniel.
 

mad

65
0
dextercioby said:
A SCALAR YES,but A VECTOR NO...
[tex] F_{x}=... [N] [/tex]
and similar for F_{y} woud have been the correct formulas...

Daniel.
I have been using vectors with units for over a year in my physics courses. Every teacher in the physics department teaches this. A force has components in i, j and k.. how can it not have units? But I dont want to start an argument here about this, that's what we use here. Thanks for pointing that out, but we always put units, vectors or not, in my college. So please lets go back to the question.. do you have any clues/tips on how to do it.. I've been trying for a long time now.
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,950
532
I'm asking you (for the second time) to post the original text of the problem...Else i cannot help,as i cannot lmake an idea about the charges' distribution and therefore i cannot compute any forces...

Daniel.

P.S.Ask a teacher at your school to measure (in Newtons) the vector [itex] 2\vec{i} + 3 \vec{j} [/itex]. :wink:

P.P.S.Take the table of units (SI-MKgs) and search for FORCE.Tell me if they put the vector on the "oblect"...
 

quasar987

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,771
7
Ok, my first post was a little reckless.

Here's a way to do it...

Draw a cartesian coordinate with the charge q at the center and draw also the vector force. Find the angle it makes with the x axis using the sine law or something.

You know the charge 2,5Q will have to be put somewhere along the line along which the actual force act. So you can use the scalar version of coulombs law to find the distance r along this line where you must but the 2,5Q charge. And use the angle found previously to find the components. Sclalar version of coulomb's law:

[tex]|\vec{F}| = \frac{k(2,5Q)q}{r^2}[/tex]

I hope that's clear enough.
 

mad

65
0
dextercioby said:
I'm asking you (for the second time) to post the original text of the problem...Else i cannot help,as i cannot lmake an idea about the charges' distribution and therefore i cannot compute any forces...

Daniel.

P.S.Ask a teacher at your school to measure (in Newtons) the vector [itex] 2\vec{i} + 3 \vec{j} [/itex]. :wink:

P.P.S.Take the table of units (SI-MKgs) and search for FORCE.Tell me if they put the vector on the "oblect"...

Sorry for the question, I posted the one they asked but forgot to add that they're ponctual charges. It's in french, that's why I translated it. But basically, the two charges create a resultant force of the one I wrote in my post. They then ask where to put a ponctual 2,5Q charge to nullfy the force applied on the charge. So that's why the force has to be the inverse of the other one. You can just take on from there, I just need to equal the 2 equations I posted to find the 2,5Q charge's position vector.

I'll ask the teacher, that is if he doesnt kill me because he's nuts about units.

Take a position vector R= (3i + 2j) m . It has to have units, or else what is 3 in i and 2 in j ?.. anyways, thanks
 
281
0
sorry to interfere, but for

[tex]|\vec{F}| = \frac{k(2,5Q)q}{r^2}[/tex]

I was just wondering do the commas represent decimals?
if not, then what?

Thanks,
MS
 
Last edited:

mad

65
0
MathStudent said:
sorry to interfere, but for

[tex]|\vec{F}| = \frac{k(2,5Q)q}{r^2}[/tex]

do the commas represent decimals?
if not, then what?

Thanks,
MS
yes, decimals, as in 2 and a half Q
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,950
532
MathStudent said:
sorry to interfere, but for

[tex]|\vec{F}| = \frac{k(2,5Q)q}{r^2}[/tex]

do the commas represent decimals?
if not, then what?

Thanks,
MS
Yes in his and (incidentally on mine) side of the world the comma is a decimal and the decimal point indicates 3 consecutive zero-s in a number which are at the left of the comma...
[tex] 1000\frac{3}{10} =1,000.3=1.000,3 [/tex]

Daniel.
 
281
0
dextercioby said:
Yes in his and (incidentally on mine) side of the world the comma is a decimal and the decimal point indicates 3 consecutive zero-s in a number which are at the left of the comma...
[tex] 1000\frac{3}{10} =1,000.3=1.000,3 [/tex]

Daniel.
Thanks for the explanation. I should have figured it was just a crazy "Euro-thing" :biggrin:
 

quasar987

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,771
7
mad,

I'm guessing your textbook is by Harris Benson?
 

mad

65
0
quasar987 said:
mad,

I'm guessing your textbook is by Harris Benson?
Exactly :)

And I'm not in Europe ;) in Montreal , Canada
 

quasar987

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,771
7
That's where I'm from too. Actually South shore of montreal. I used to go to Cegep Edouard-Montpetit; where do you go?
 
281
0
mad said:
Exactly :)

And I'm not in Europe ;) in Montreal , Canada
My bad,,, I should have said crazy "wannabe Euro-thing" :smile:
j/k
 

mad

65
0
quasar987 said:
That's where I'm from too. Actually South shore of montreal. I used to go to Cegep Edouard-Montpetit; where do you go?
Bois-de-Boulogne. What program are you in now? I want to enter UdeM in medecine
 

quasar987

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,771
7
Bois-de-Boulogne.. this rings a bell.. is there a physics teacher named Yves Charbonneau there?

I'm presently studying at UdeM in math-physics.
 

mad

65
0
quasar987 said:
Bois-de-Boulogne.. this rings a bell.. is there a physics teacher named Yves Charbonneau there?

I'm presently studying at UdeM in math-physics.
I think the only Charbonneau there is named Pierre Charbonneau..
 

quasar987

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,771
7
Oh.. he must work elsewhere then.

Good luck getting the grades to enter in medecine, and feel free to post some more if you encounter difficulties!
 

mad

65
0
quasar987 said:
Oh.. he must work elsewhere then.

Good luck getting the grades to enter in medecine, and feel free to post some more if you encounter difficulties!
I still haven't received an answer for this one :P . I'll check tomorrow with my teacher. I'm in my 2nd session, and my cote R from the first one is great, so if I can continue like that, maybe next year I can make an admission. :) Thanks bro
 

Related Threads for: Coulomb's law vector question.

Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
14K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • Posted
Replies
8
Views
29K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top