Calculating Charges of Two Small Nonconducting Spheres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Spheres
AI Thread Summary
Two small nonconducting spheres with a total charge of 80 microC exert a repulsive force of 12 N when placed 1.06 m apart. Using Coulomb’s Law, the product of their charges can be calculated as Q1Q2 = 1.498 x 10^-9 C. To find the individual charges, one can substitute Q1 + Q2 = 80 microC into the equation, resulting in a quadratic equation. If the force were attractive, the sign in the equation would change, leading to Q1Q2 = -1.498 x 10^-9 C and a different quadratic equation. This method effectively allows for the determination of each sphere's charge.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
Two small nonconducting spheres have a total charge of 80 microC. When place 1.06 m apart, the force exerts on the other is 12 N and is repulsive. What is the charge of each. What if the force were attractive?

Given: k, F = 12 N if repulsive but F = -12 N if attractive, Q1 + Q2 = 8 x 10^-5 C, r = 1.06 m

Using Coulomb’s Law, isolate Q1Q2 .

Q1Q2 = 1.498 x 10^-9 C?

Then I thought I would use substitution for Q1 + Q2 = 8 x 10^-5 C and Q1Q2 = 1.498 x 10^-9 C.

But now I get a huge quadratic equation. Is this the correct method??

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is correct. You have to solve the qudratic to find Q1, Q2. There really isn't a better way.
 


Yes, you are on the right track! To solve for the individual charges of each sphere, you can use the following equation:

F = k(Q1Q2)/r^2

Substituting in the given values, we have:

12 N = (8.99 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2)(Q1Q2)/(1.06 m)^2

Solving for Q1Q2, we get:

Q1Q2 = 1.498 x 10^-9 C

Now, as you mentioned, we can use substitution to solve for the individual charges. We know that Q1 + Q2 = 8 x 10^-5 C, so we can rewrite the equation as:

Q1 = (8 x 10^-5 C) - Q2

Substituting this into the equation for Q1Q2, we get:

(8 x 10^-5 C - Q2)Q2 = 1.498 x 10^-9 C

Simplifying, we get a quadratic equation:

Q2^2 - (8 x 10^-5 C)Q2 + 1.498 x 10^-9 C = 0

Using the quadratic formula, we can solve for Q2 and then plug that value back into the equation for Q1 to find its value.

If the force were attractive, we would simply change the sign in the equation for F, so we would have:

-12 N = (8.99 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2)(Q1Q2)/(1.06 m)^2

Solving for Q1Q2, we get:

Q1Q2 = -1.498 x 10^-9 C

Using the same substitution method as before, we get the quadratic equation:

Q2^2 + (8 x 10^-5 C)Q2 + 1.498 x 10^-9 C = 0

Solving for Q2 and then plugging that value back into the equation for Q1, we can find the individual charges for an attractive force.

I hope this helps clarify the process for solving this problem. Keep in mind that the quadratic equation may seem intimidating, but it is a common method for solving problems involving two unknown variables. Good luck!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top