Coupled Oscillations: Understanding the Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lagrange53110
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupled Oscillation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the equations of motion for a system of coupled oscillators represented by three masses connected by springs. The user expresses confusion about the physical interpretation of the derived equations, particularly regarding the forces acting on each mass during oscillation. A participant points out a potential sign error in the user's equations and provides a general form for the equations of motion for any mass in the system. The conversation also touches on the specific equations for endpoint masses, which depend on boundary conditions. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding the physical principles behind the derived equations of motion in coupled oscillations.
Lagrange53110
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[URL]http://imgur.com/2KIhk[/URL]

Hi!

If you please look at the image. I have already determined the equations of motion.
They are as follows:

Ma1 = 2kx1+kx2
Ma2 = -2kx2+kx1+kx3
Mx3 = -2x3 +kx2

Now... what I don't understand is how does this physically happen?

If you look at say mass m1. Then when the spring is oscillating it pulls the mass to the left
on the left side of m1 which is I suppose: -kx1 and the spring on the right is also doing that at x1 so then also -kx1 and then when it oscillates further at x2 the right spring goes +kx2 which gives us: ma1 = -2kx1+kx2.

I just want to is this the correct analysis for determining the equations?
I'm just stomped and wish I knew a perfect 100% method on finding these equations.
I just "know" they're right... I just don't know why... sadly
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Lagrange53110 said:

Homework Statement



[URL]http://imgur.com/2KIhk[/URL]

Hi!

If you please look at the image. I have already determined the equations of motion.
They are as follows:

Ma1 = 2kx1+kx2
Ma2 = -2kx2+kx1+kx3
Mx3 = -2x3 +kx2

Now... what I don't understand is how does this physically happen?

If you look at say mass m1. Then when the spring is oscillating it pulls the mass to the left
on the left side of m1 which is I suppose: -kx1 and the spring on the right is also doing that at x1 so then also -kx1 and then when it oscillates further at x2 the right spring goes +kx2 which gives us: ma1 = -2kx1+kx2.

I just want to is this the correct analysis for determining the equations?
I'm just stomped and wish I knew a perfect 100% method on finding these equations.
I just "know" they're right... I just don't know why... sadly

Can't see your picture, but I think you have a sign error. It probably should be:
M \ddot{x}_1 = - 2 k x_1 + k x_2 = k(x_2 - x_1) - k x_1
M \ddot{x}_2 = - 2 k x_2 + k x_1 + k x_3 = k(x_3 - x2) + k(x_1 - x_2)
M \ddot{x}_3 = - 2 k x_3 + k x_2 = k (x_2 - x_3) - k x_3

In general, if you have N mass, the equation of motion on the j-th one (if j is not the first or last one) that's connected to two neighbors is:

M \ddot{x}_j = k x_{j+1} + k x_{j-1} - 2 k x_{j}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mathfeel said:
Can't see your picture, but I think you have a sign error. It probably should be:
M \ddot{x}_1 = - 2 k x_1 + k x_2 = k(x_2 - x_1) - k x_1
M \ddot{x}_2 = - 2 k x_2 + k x_1 + k x_3 = k(x_3 - x2) + k(x_1 - x_2)
M \ddot{x}_3 = - 2 k x_3 + k x_2 = k (x_2 - x_3) - k x_3

In general, if you have N mass, the equation of motion on the j-th one (if j is not the first or last one) that's connected to two neighbors is:

M \ddot{x}_j = k x_{j+1} + k x_{j-1} - 2 k x_{j}

Okay that makes sense! That is the same conclusion I came up with the 3 masses scenario. Because the two xvalues to the left and the right cause positive "tugs" if you will.
What is the equation in general for the endpoint masses.

Would be in your case -2x(j) +2x(j+1)? for the left? and -2x(j)+2x(j-1)?
 
Lagrange53110 said:
Okay that makes sense! That is the same conclusion I came up with the 3 masses scenario. Because the two xvalues to the left and the right cause positive "tugs" if you will.
What is the equation in general for the endpoint masses.

Would be in your case -2x(j) +2x(j+1)? for the left? and -2x(j)+2x(j-1)?

For the end point, it depends on boundary condition. Since I can't see your picture, I am going to assume the j=1 and j=N mass is connected to fix wall by a spring, then

m \ddot{x}_1 = k (x_2 - x_1) - k x_1 = k x_2 - 2 k x_1
m \ddot{x}_N = k (x_{N-1} - x_{N}) - k x_{N} = k x_{N-1} - 2 k x_{N}
 
mathfeel said:
For the end point, it depends on boundary condition. Since I can't see your picture, I am going to assume the j=1 and j=N mass is connected to fix wall by a spring, then

m \ddot{x}_1 = k (x_2 - x_1) - k x_1 = k x_2 - 2 k x_1
m \ddot{x}_N = k (x_{N-1} - x_{N}) - k x_{N} = k x_{N-1} - 2 k x_{N}

but why?

I am confused how these equations are derived.

I have derived the middle mass equation.

But I am unsure about some conventions I have used...

please can you show me... what happens physically?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top