Coupled Oscillators Initial Conditions and Phase

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about coupled oscillators, the main focus is on how initial conditions, particularly zero initial velocities, impact the constants of integration, specifically phase shifts A1 and A2. The equations provided illustrate two approaches to solving the system, one including phase shifts and the other excluding them. It is clarified that assuming zero initial velocities leads to the conclusion that both A1 and A2 must equal zero, thus simplifying the solution. The reasoning behind this is derived from evaluating the velocities at t=0, which results in conditions that necessitate A1 and A2 being zero. Therefore, the assumption of zero initial velocities does indeed allow for the exclusion of phase shifts in the solution.
yklin_tux
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello I have a question about coupled oscillators and what initial conditions affect what constants of integration.

In the book I have, A.P. French Vibrations and Waves, the guesses at solutions are chosen at random and sometimes do include a phase shift, while sometimes they dont.

For solutions to a coupled oscillator example (two masses, three equal strings, no damping) there is a set of two equations

x1 = a*cos(w1*t+A1) + b*cos(w1*t + A2)
x2 = a*cos(w1*t+A1) - b*cos(w1*t + A2)

and this is based on the guess that one solution to the initial differential equation was of the form

x = C*cos(w*t + A)

I get why and how that is, but when assuming that the initial velocities are zero, the book just guesses at a solution of the form

x = C*cos(w*t), without the phase.

Which would give something of the form

x1 = a*cos(w1*t) + b*cos(w1*t)
x2 = a*cos(w1*t) - b*cos(w1*t)

I have to deal with a problem where I have initial values for the displacement, but the velocities are assumed to be zero.

Obviously, the first case, where there are phases, requires me to solve for 4 unknowns {a, b, A1, A2}

But if I use the latter case without A1, A2, the job is easier.

My question is, does the assumption that the initial velocities = 0 allow me to assume A1 = A2 = 0? and get rid of the phases?

Or is it incorrect for me to assume a solution in the form described above, without the phases present (i.e. I have to find A1, A2, from my initial conditions)

The book doesn't do a good job of explaining why they guess one solution with a phase and one without, so I sometimes get confused on that.

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The book is not guessing that when the initial velocities are zero, the phases are zero. Starting from
yklin_tux said:
x1 = a*cos(w1*t+A1) + b*cos(w1*t + A2)
x2 = a*cos(w1*t+A1) - b*cos(w1*t + A2)

and taking derivatives to find the velocities which you evaluate at ##t=0##, you get
##v_1(0)=-a \sin A_1-b \sin A_2=0##
##v_2(0)=-a \sin A_1+b \sin A_2=0##

If you add the equations, you get
##-2a \sin A_1=0##.

You have a product of three things that is equal to zero. This means that one of the following is TRUE:

1. ##2=0##, not a chance even for small values of ##2## :oldsmile:
2. ##a=0##, which is the trivial solution because it means there are no oscillations. :oldfrown:
3. ##\sin A_1 = 0## which implies that ##A_1=0##, yay! :partytime:

Similarly, by subtracting the equations you can show that #A_2=0##.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top