COVID COVID-19 Coronavirus Containment Efforts

Click For Summary
Containment efforts for the COVID-19 Coronavirus are facing significant challenges, with experts suggesting that it may no longer be feasible to prevent its global spread. The virus has a mortality rate of approximately 2-3%, which could lead to a substantial increase in deaths if it becomes as widespread as the flu. Current data indicates around 6,000 cases, with low mortality rates in areas with good healthcare. Vaccine development is underway, but it is unlikely to be ready in time for the current outbreak, highlighting the urgency of the situation. As the outbreak evolves, the healthcare system may face considerable strain, underscoring the need for continued monitoring and response efforts.
  • #781
One thing that is interesting is the disparity between mortality rates in different countries. In Germany, with 1,565 cases, the mortality (based on deaths/total cases) is only about 0.13%, and critical cases (based on critical case/active cases) 0.58%. In Italy, mortality is 6.2% (48X higher) and critical cases 10.3% (17.7X higher).

Maybe Germany just has more accurate statistics due to widespread testing? If it is true, it might suggest the mortality rate is nearer to that of the flu. But I am wondering how those rates are calculated for the flu since most people don't get tested for the flu. It could also be that Germany's COVID-19 testing is outpacing normal flu testing. Is it possible that the mortality rate of the flu is exaggerated as well?

Even if the true rate is 0.13% or lower, Italy is still struggling pretty hard to handle the additional strain on the hospitals.
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #782
Here in Sweden we now have got new directives.
The community spread threat level has been increased to the highest, since there have been indications of some community spread of the virus.

Because of this our national health recommendations has been updated, and those who are feeling ill with cold- or flulike symptoms are recommended to stay at home and don't go to work, school or social gatherings.

Source:
http://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/risken-for-smittspridning-hojs-till-hogsta-nivan/
(only in Swedish, sorry)

Furthermore, in my city, those who are employed in healthcare or work at the university have been advised to cancel all travels and public meetings that are not absolutely necessary.

In Sweden we now have 325 confirmed cases (and no known deaths), but worth noting is also that we have a pretty small population, about 10 million.

Personally I have sent advice and guidelines to my old parents, the same guidelines I wrote about previously in this thread, gathered from the WHO advice.
 
  • #783
This seems like suspicious maths to me:

Screen Shot 2020-03-10 at 3.58.27 PM.png


vs

Screen Shot 2020-03-10 at 3.56.47 PM.png


I suppose if gamma = 1, there's no problem. :olduhh:
 
  • #784
"China stopped the coronavirus. Your country won't"



What happens if my or your country won't be able to stop it? Does it mean continuous exposure like the common colds?
 
  • #785
homeylova223 said:
What would Issac Newton think about viruses, and illnesses based on his research.

Not really, what you are asking, but much of Newton's groundbreaking work was done in a period when the university had closed because of the plague, and he had to work from home.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/teach/isaac-Newton-the-man-who-discovered-gravity/zh8792p

Many companies are now introducing work from home where possible to help with the social distancing measures to prevent COVID-19 spread.
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...om-home-flexible-best-practices-tips-12421586
https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/8/21170547/tim-cook-remote-iphone-apple-global-coronavirus
https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/10/...ican-employees-work-from-home-sick-leave-fund
https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/09/b...ff-work-from-home-to-reduce-coronavirus-risk/
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #786
Iran just released 70,000 inmates on FURLOUGH because of the relentless spread of the corona virus ...

Wow! I wonder how they will summon them back when the medical crisis is over...

Like... do they have LOCATOR CHIPS in their bodies?

Wonder if we can do the same with our inmates... uhmmm...
 
  • #787
OmCheeto said:
This seems like suspicious maths to me:

View attachment 258505

vs

View attachment 258506

I suppose if gamma = 1, there's no problem. :olduhh:
The problem is the inconsistent use of ##\gamma##. In "Basic reproduction number" gamma is the time someone is infectious, in "Compartmental models in epidemiology" it's the inverse of time.
Edit: Mentioned it on the talk pages of these articles.

@Jarvis323: Germany has a lot of new cases right now, many of them will die over time. Italy has more older cases and it had the disease hit some hospitals and retirement homes, that drives up the case fatality rate.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #788
I saw a very interesting report from Italy on BBC News, regarding the countermeasures against the virus spread, the impact and also a short interview with a doctor in one of the worst hit regions:
Interviewed medical doctor said:
"We are facing a war now here."
which echoes the words of Dr Richard Hatchett in a previous video I posted in this thread.

Coronavirus - Italy in lockdown - BBC News (Mar 10, 2020)
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #789
And here is a very interesting and informative interview with Giacomo Grasselli:
Video description said:
Giacomo Grasselli - a senior Italian government health official who is coordinating the network of intensive care units in Lombardy - explains the “critical” situation in Italy, brought about by the Covid-19 outbreak.
I am quoting one of the things he said:
Giacomo Grasselli said:
Hopefully in other countries it's not behaving like this, but what is very, very, very important for every country [...] is that everyone must understand if you're not very careful in controlling the spread of the disease, this disease will overwhelm your system no matter how efficient, good or modern it is.
Sobering words indeed.
Source: Interview time at 5m 35s.

The entire interview is here:
Coronavirus ‘worse than a bomb’ on Italy, says doctor coordinating response (Channel 4 News, Mar 10, 2020)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #790
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.03.20029843v2
Background: The COVID-19 outbreak containment strategies in China based on non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) appear to be effective.
...
Without NPIs, the number of COVID-19 cases would likely have shown a 67-fold increase (IQR: 44 - 94), with the effectiveness of different interventions varying. The early detection and isolation of cases was estimated to prevent more infections than travel restrictions and contact reductions, but integrated NPIs would achieve the strongest and most rapid effect. If NPIs could have been conducted one week, two weeks, or three weeks earlier in China, cases could have been reduced by 66%, 86%, and 95%, respectively, together with significantly reducing the number of affected areas. However, if NPIs were conducted one week, two weeks, or three weeks later, the number of cases could have shown a 3-fold, 7-fold, and 18-fold increase across China, respectively. Results also suggest that the social distancing intervention should be continued for the next few months in China to prevent case numbers increasing again after travel restrictions were lifted on February 17, 2020. Conclusion: The NPIs deployed in China appear to be effectively containing the COVID-19 outbreak, but the efficacy of the different interventions varied, with the early case detection and contact reduction being the most effective. Moreover, deploying the NPIs early is also important to prevent further spread. Early and integrated NPI strategies should be prepared, adopted and adjusted to minimize health, social and economic impacts in affected regions around the World.
 
  • Like
Likes mattt, atyy, russ_watters and 1 other person
  • #791
1583898113788.png


10 MARCH 2020
Coronavirus latest: global infections pass 100,000
Updates on the respiratory illness that has infected tens of thousands of people and killed several thousand.


d41586-020-00154-w_17752016.jpg

Officials spray antiseptic solution in Seoul.Credit: Chung Sung-Jun/Getty
Here’s the latest news on the outbreak.

10 March 03:30 GMT — Call for more funding
At least US$8 billion is needed to address the most pressing threats posed by the novel coronavirus, says the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB), an independent group co-convened by the World Health Organization and the World Bank Group to combat public health emergencies.
The money is needed in addition to the tens of billions of dollars already pledged from the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank Group and individual governments.
The GPMB released a report on 9 March calling on advanced economies, such as the members of the Group of Seven and the Group of 20, and financial institutions to provide money to address five priority areas. These include strengthening weak healthcare systems; supporting the World Health Organization’s efforts to help vulnerable countries; developing diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines; strengthening regional surveillance; and ensuring sufficient protective equipment is available for health workers.
9 March 04:00 GMT — Global cases pass 100,000
The number of known global cases of COVID-19 passed 100,000 over the weekend. On 8 March, the World Health Organization reported 105,586 confirmed cases across more than 100 countries and territories. Although the outbreak has been slowing in China, where it originated, the country still accounts for almost 80% of confirmed cases.
6 March 11:30 GMT — US Congress approves US$8.3 billion for Coronavirus response
The United States Congress has passed an emergency spending bill that will allocate US$8.3 billion for the country’s Coronavirus response. The House of Representatives passed the bill in a near-unanimous vote on Wednesday afternoon; the Senate followed suit on Thursday.

[ . . . ]

###
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00154-w#correction-0
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN
  • #792
BillTre said:
Mask vs. Beard:
View attachment 258493

Masks will not work well if the mask-face seal is compromised by facial hair.
I like the names for the different hair styles.
There is no easy way to test fitment of the respirators either. At least with a rubber mask it is easy to test for a positive seal. I’ve never liked fabric respirators.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #793
atyy said:
I recommend getting your personal moisturizer, since frequent hand-washing leads to dry and cracked skin.
Thanks for the advice! I have now noticed that effect on my hands. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
  • #794
bhobba said:
Here in Australia the government has not acted hard - yet - I just prey they time it right. And while 'amusing' the toilet paper debacle does not give me confidence. Unfortunately my gut feeling is people really are that 'dumb' ...
And that happens for something insignificant. Imagine some more desperate for something truly important. And then imagine you are in the US and those guys have guns...

I really doubt it will come to that though.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #795
chemisttree said:
I really doubt it will come to that though.

So do I.

Some people on twitter were concerned China says it will have an emergency vaccine in April sometime:
https://nypost.com/2020/03/10/coronavirus-vaccine-could-be-ready-by-april-chinese-officials-say/

They were all worried they were going to be forcibly vaccinated. They didn't seem to understand the word emergency. Highly doubtful one would be released to the public that had not been tested as safe which is going to take a least a year the experts say. Its simply as it said - for emergency use only.

I doubt its any further along the development cycle than others like the UQ one or Modernia. China IMHO is just trying to grab headlines.

A question. During the discussion a lot of people complained they had trouble with the swine flu vaccine. Yet here in Aus I am not aware of anyone that had trouble - I certainly didn't and my immune system has a superhighway through it from taking Biologics (at the moment Cosentyx - its not too bad - only, if I recall correctly, a 5 times increase in the risk of colds or the flu, which is why you must get the flu shot each year - others are evidently much worse). Did some US people get a bad batch or something?

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #796
bhobba said:
So do I.

Some people on twitter were concerned China says it will have an emergency vaccine in April sometime:
https://nypost.com/2020/03/10/coronavirus-vaccine-could-be-ready-by-april-chinese-officials-say/

They were all worried they were going to be forcibly vaccinated. They didn't seem to understand the word emergency. Highly doubtful one would be released to the public that had not been tested as safe which is going to take a least a year the experts say. Its simply as it said - for emergency use only.

I doubt its any further along the development cycle than others like the UQ one or Modernia. China IMHO is just trying to grab headlines.

A question. During the discussion a lot of people complained they had trouble with the swine flu vaccine. Yet here in Aus I am not aware of anyone that had trouble - I certainly didn't and my immune system has a superhighway through it from taking Biologics (at the moment Cosentyx - its not too bad - only, if I recall correctly, a 5 times increase in the risk of colds or the flu, which is why you must get the flu shot each year - others are evidently much worse). Did some US people get a bad batch or something?

Thanks
Bill
Nobody I knew had a bad reaction either. Some people always have a reaction to the flu shot. I guess they must complain a lot. I certainly don’t complain about a sore arm from 10 years ago! Of course I never got Guillain–Barré syndrome either.

Shingle vaccine is another story though! Side effects from those are brutal!

I remember my Mom always complaining that the flu shots gave you all the symptoms of the flu and so she didn’t like them. Thank god there wasn’t an internet back then! Oh, the humanity!
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #797
link

The person and the story seems to be valid, as far as I could check. If anybody has the revoked study (link or saved copy) then please share it somehow.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #799
mfb said:
At the time Italy had found 900 cases they had 20 deaths. Germany has found 1200 cases, but only two deaths (both from today). I don't think Germans live that much healthier. Okay, Italy had a couple of older patients early on, but it's still a big difference. Most likely it's a better test coverage.Then you do that. It's a travel restriction (and a ban of events with large crowds), not a restriction on any movement.
Here is BBC's article
Maybe they're more susceptible. Many old people. And maybe because they 'beso' and hug.
 
  • #802
Just now I read that we have the first confirmed death in Sweden due to the coronavirus. It was an elderly man with underlying health problems, and he was treated at intensive care at a hospital in the capital Stockholm. This news is so recent that it is not yet reflected in the international statistics.

Edit: I've now found a news agency source1 for this info (only in Swedish, sorry):
http://www.dn.se/sthlm/en-person-i-stockholm-dod-i-nya-coronaviruset/

1And thereby I also in a small way promote the importance of mentioning sources :smile:, and checking sources, which I think is particularly important in a time like this. We are dealing with a brand new virus, and regardless of this we also live in a time when the spread of disinformation, intentional or unintentional, is sadly not uncommon.
 
Last edited:
  • #803
Pro-Tip 1: Costo has LOTS of rubbing alcohol.

NONE at: Walmart, grocery stores, and Target. . .

Pro-Tip 2: Dollar Tree has hand sanitizers

None at: ...
 
  • #804
Jarvis323 said:
Maybe Germany just has more accurate statistics due to widespread testing? If it is true, it might suggest the mortality rate is nearer to that of the flu.
.
That's my understanding. What I have been reading (eg in South Korea it has a death rate of about 0.5%) when more testing is done (eg in Aus we are setting up drive though testing stations, fever clinics etc like a number of other countries) you get more accurate results. The flu is 0.1% but we have the vaccine and while worse for older people the flu seems to have a lower death rate in that age group, again possibly due to the vaccine. It's hard to tell, but the feeling I get is its about the same as the flu if we didn't have a vaccine for those under 60. It's more deadly over 60, but, as mentioned before, that may also be because we do not have the vaccine.

On a positive note I just looked at the website of the local medical clinic I go to, and they look like they are doing the right thing:
https://www.redlandsclinic.com.au/

I didn't expect anything else from them really - the senior doctor there is very good. The previous senior doctor was one of the most famous in Australia - he had a column in the Australian Medical Associations Journal advising on the more difficult cases and educating on often difficult to recognize diseases like Polymyalgia Rheumatica.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #805
kyphysics said:
Pro-Tip 1: Costo has LOTS of rubbing alcohol.

NONE at: Walmart, grocery stores, and Target. . .

Pro-Tip 2: Dollar Tree has hand sanitizers

None at: ...
Where are you? In San Antonio sanitizer and wipes are in short supply but IPA alcohol is still available at Wal Mart. I imagine on the west coast and New York the situation is different.
 
  • #807
A CDC Norovirus report from 6 years ago notes the following.

“However, 1 in 5 food service workers have reported working at least once in the previous year while sick with vomiting or diarrhea. Fear of job loss and not wanting to leave coworkers short-staffed were cited as significant factors in their decision.”

My advice: learn to cook and stay home!
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt and Astronuc
  • #809
Jarvis323 said:
One thing that is interesting is the disparity between mortality rates in different countries. In Germany, with 1,565 cases, the mortality (based on deaths/total cases) is only about 0.13%, and critical cases (based on critical case/active cases) 0.58%. In Italy, mortality is 6.2% (48X higher) and critical cases 10.3% (17.7X higher).

Maybe Germany just has more accurate statistics due to widespread testing? If it is true, it might suggest the mortality rate is nearer to that of the flu. But I am wondering how those rates are calculated for the flu since most people don't get tested for the flu. It could also be that Germany's COVID-19 testing is outpacing normal flu testing. Is it possible that the mortality rate of the flu is exaggerated as well?

Even if the true rate is 0.13% or lower, Italy is still struggling pretty hard to handle the additional strain on the hospitals.

bhobba said:
That's my understanding. What I have been reading (eg in South Korea it has a death rate of about 0.5%) when more testing is done (eg in Aus we are setting up drive though testing stations, fever clinics etc like a number of other countries) you get more accurate results.

The death rate could also depend on the quality of care available. If the health system is overwhelmed, and there is a shortage of equipment such as mechanical ventilators, then the death rate could go up. If the death rate is not a fixed number (ie. there is no "true" death rate that is invariant across situations), but depends on what we do, then it is very important to slow the spread of the virus, to make sure that health systems have enough staff, space and equipment to treat patients.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #810
Jarvis323 said:
One thing that is interesting is the disparity between mortality rates in different countries. In Germany, with 1,565 cases, the mortality (based on deaths/total cases) is only about 0.13%, and critical cases (based on critical case/active cases) 0.58%. In Italy, mortality is 6.2% (48X higher) and critical cases 10.3% (17.7X higher).
As it seems right now in Italy (or at least in the most affected area) anybody with respiratory illness is asked to stay at home. Only the severe cases are transferred to hospital (and being tested): already with pneumonia or short breath/low oxygen.

So, if I take it right that specific '80 percent' of the ill is just not visible now, there.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 516 ·
18
Replies
516
Views
36K
Replies
0
Views
460
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K