Crack the Code with Number Box: Discover the Mystery of the 20x20 Square

  • Thread starter Thread starter C Squiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Figure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a puzzle involving a 20x20 square where, after 1000 cycles, the upper left 10x10 section consistently contains all zeros. Participants are exploring the relationships between the four 10x10 boxes within the larger square, suggesting that the colors and numbers are arbitrary and that the solution lies in the interactions between cells rather than their specific values. Observations indicate that covering parts of the box alters the colors and numbers in non-linear ways, supporting the idea that the cell values are not significant on their own. The main questions focus on understanding why the upper left box turns to zeros and the fate of the other numbers. This inquiry is part of an inductive modeling assignment in an informatics class.
C Squiz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone-

I'm trying to figure out this puzzle that has to with numbers inside a 20x20 square.

After 1000 cycles, the square will always contain a 10x10 square in the upper left hand corner of all 0's, which will not change. My job is to find out what is happening to all the numbers, and why they do what they are doing. You are allowed to enter any number you wish into the cycle processor.

Hopefully someone can help me come up with ideas, or even provide me with some hints as to what they think is happening. I've looked over this for hours, and can't figure it out, but that is probably because I'm bad with numbers! This assignment is for an Informatics class. Please someone help me out! Thanks so much!

Here is the website address: http://informatics.indiana.edu/rocha/whitebox/WhiteBoxDigits.html

or the color version: http://informatics.indiana.edu/rocha/whitebox/WhiteBox.html
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, at first glance.

I will make one assumption:
- the actual colours and the actual numbers (except perhaps zero and black) are arbitrary. i.e it has nothing to do with the value of the number or the order of the colour. The numbers might as well be letters (at least for now).

Why? Because the colour box must be solvable without numbers. If we need to resort to numbers to solve it, then we're just using the Number Box, and the Colour Box is a merely red herring.

Ok, some deductions:
The upper corner is exactly 1/4th of the entire area. I can see three other identically-shaped areas. My intuition tells me that this box is divided into four smaller 10x10 boxes for a reason. I would suspect that the states of these four boxes are related.

We can set up some notation.
Four 10x10 boxes:
A B
C D
Each contains 100 squares in a grid
We can uniquely identify any cell as a 10x10 within its box.

Thus, the very upper left cell is labelled A0,0
The cell in the 10th column and 10th row is the lower right corner of Box A, and is labelled A9,9.
The very lower right cell is labelled D9,9.

I suspect that the colour of A0,0 is dependent on the states of B0,0 , C0,0 and D0,0.

I also suspect there's a relationship with its neighbours, since the patern grows from one corner, not randomly.

I'll dwell some more. Does that help you out? Or have you already gotten that far?
 
BTW, what course is this for? Programming? Logic? Deductive reasoning?
 
Update:
- Merely covering the browser window with another window causes all the colours and numbers to alter.
- The alterations are not linear (eg. multiple blues covered and then unveiled will not reveal multiple pinks or multiple reds, but multiple different colours)
- Merely covering part of the box has the same effect. In fact, you can cover only part of a cell and upon uncovering, it will partially have a different colour.

These observations support the theory that the actual cell values are arbitrary, and that only the relationship between cells is relevant.
 
DaveC426913 said:
OK, at first glance.

I will make one assumption:
- the actual colours and the actual numbers (except perhaps zero and black) are arbitrary. i.e it has nothing to do with the value of the number or the order of the colour. The numbers might as well be letters (at least for now).

Why? Because the colour box must be solvable without numbers. If we need to resort to numbers to solve it, then we're just using the Number Box, and the Colour Box is a merely red herring.

Ok, some deductions:
The upper corner is exactly 1/4th of the entire area. I can see three other identically-shaped areas. My intuition tells me that this box is divided into four smaller 10x10 boxes for a reason. I would suspect that the states of these four boxes are related.

We can set up some notation.
Four 10x10 boxes:
A B
C D
Each contains 100 squares in a grid
We can uniquely identify any cell as a 10x10 within its box.

Thus, the very upper left cell is labelled A0,0
The cell in the 10th column and 10th row is the lower right corner of Box A, and is labelled A9,9.
The very lower right cell is labelled D9,9.

I suspect that the colour of A0,0 is dependent on the states of B0,0 , C0,0 and D0,0.

I also suspect there's a relationship with its neighbours, since the patern grows from one corner, not randomly.

I'll dwell some more. Does that help you out? Or have you already gotten that far?

Somewhat, I found the same ideas as you did. I figured it had to do with a relationship between the 4 10x10 squares. I tried processing the box to a total of 1000 cycles multiple times, printed the results out, and highlighted all of the zeros in the total area. After each result, I received different numbers of 0's. So obviously, this isn't a factor.

You said that the numbers are related with its neighbors since the pattern grows from one corner, not randomly. What do you mean by this?

I guess the main thing I'm trying to figure out now is why the numbers turn to 0's in the top left 10x10 box. And when these numbers all turn to 0's, where the other numbers are going, and why?

This assignment is for inductive modeling. Has to do with information (informatics), although I really don't see the point.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top