Creating a function based on data using integration

JFonseka
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I first posted this in the pre-calculus section, then the guy who first came up with the formula hinted at integration, so I guess it's meant to be in the calculus section

Now this isn't a homework question, it's something me and some others are looking into, and someone posted this function, and I'm not sure how he worked it out:

Creating a function for Elvis' album sales based on the RIAA certifications of his albums that have been certified so far

69 albms - over 500,000 sales certified
39 albums - over 1,000,000
19 albums - over 2,000,000
11 albums - over 3,000,000
4 albums - over 4,000,000 and 5,000,000
2 albums - over 6,000,000
1 albums - over 9,000,000

Let exclude the 4 albums over 4 million, which could be estimated on their own and disturb the linear repartition of figures.

I set X = 500000*x

Then Elvis statistics are almost perfectly equal to the function 1/(1,23*x + 0,278).

Let x = 1 if you want to find albums that sold over 500,000
Let x = 2 if you want to find albums that sold over 1 million
etc.

So what he's done is used the figures from the albums certified to create an equation. So therefore if you substitute 1 for x in the function, which is actually equal to 500,000 you will get all the albums that certified for over 500,000 sales, it's not exact, but it's a close enough function, how did he work that function out?


Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably just drew a graph and concentrated on the points that seemed to fit a smooth curve. Adjusted a and b in f(x)=1/(ax+b) to fit it. You can use least squares type techniques to help to you estimate the constants. But I'm confused. I put x=1 into 1/(1.23*x+0.278) and I get 0.663. That's not 67. Do you mean I should multiply by 100 also?
 
Dick said:
Probably just drew a graph and concentrated on the points that seemed to fit a smooth curve. Adjusted a and b in f(x)=1/(ax+b) to fit it. You can use least squares type techniques to help to you estimate the constants. But I'm confused. I put x=1 into 1/(1.23*x+0.278) and I get 0.663. That's not 67. Do you mean I should multiply by 100 also?

Yea you have to multiply by 100, I got 66.3 too, but I guess he rounded up, not sure why he rounded up, but the other values seems to indicate that's what he did.
 
JFonseka said:
Yea you have to multiply by 100, I got 66.3 too, but I guess he rounded up, not sure why he rounded up, but the other values seems to indicate that's what he did.

Like I said, you can use least squares to fit almost any smooth curve pretty well. Especially if you start throwing out points that don't fit. And use creative rounding to boot.
 
I'm not too sure what that is, but I'll look at it now!

Thanks Dick.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top