Creating Wave Functions With One Variable: Can It Be Done?

AI Thread Summary
Creating a wave function with just one variable is possible using the imaginary unit i, as demonstrated by examples like f(x)=i^x and f(x)=2^ix. The discussion explores whether a wave function can exist without the number i while still using only one variable. It suggests that a standard wave can be represented in the form r(x)e^(ig(x)), where g(x) relates to frequency and phase. Additionally, it is noted that a one-dimensional wave of any shape can be constructed, but achieving a purely real waveform without i requires specific transformations. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity of wave functions and the role of the imaginary unit in their formulation.
johann1301
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
With the number i, its possible to create a wave function with just one variable.

example:

f(x)=i^x

or..

f(x)=2^ix

But is there any wave function without the number i AND with only one(x and y) variable? can this be created?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
y = sin(x)
 
Hello,

Are you aware of the general equation of a wave?

Hint: (It is a second order differential equation)
 
johann1301 said:
With the number i, its possible to create a wave function with just one variable.

example:

f(x)=i^x

or..

f(x)=2^ix

But is there any wave function without the number i AND with only one(x and y) variable? can this be created?

If you want something that oscillates, then something of the form r(x)e^(ig(x)) will give you that. A standard linear wave will be in the form g(x) = wx + c corresponding to a shift and frequency information and if you want a 'real' waveform with the same peak and trough for every wavefront then r(x) = c.

This expression will give you a complex wave-form with a real and imaginary component and if you want one or the other and not both you need to use the normal identities to get rid of the i term or the real term.
 
In fact, it is possible to construct a one-dimensional wave of any shape.
 
y = sin(x)

This is the same as

y=1/2 i e^(-i x)-1/2 i e^(i x)

so that would be "cheating"...
 
Last edited:
(ig(x))

does this mean i*g(x) (the imaginary unit times the function g of x)?
 
Hello,

Are you aware of the general equation of a wave?

Hint: (It is a second order differential equation)

I don't know anything about differential equations:(
 
Back
Top