Cubic equations with independent variables

omarxx84
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi colleages. can you help me to solve the cubic equation below:
2N(Ep-En)hp^3(x)-3[M(x,t)(Ep-En)-2NEnh]hp^2(x)-6Enh[M(x,t)+Nh]hp(x)+Enh^2[3M(x,t)+2Nh]=0 notice that all variables in the equation are dependent on x only, except M is dependent on x and t.
En, Ep, N and h are constants.
i know the solution when the equation dependent on one variable, but the problem is that M dependent on two variables x and t.
please help me and i will be very grateful for you...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
i am so sorry,
 
There is an algorithm for finding the roots of a cubic equation - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_equation. Using this algorithm might help you solve for the values of p(x) that are roots of your equation.

You haven't said anything about p(x). What information do you have about this function?
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Thread 'Useless continued fraction for 1'

I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
View full post »

Similar threads

Solving a Cubic Equation with 2 Variables
Replies
9
Views
3K
MHB Understanding Cubic Equation Formula for Polynomials of Degree Three
Replies
9
Views
3K
Substitution in a differential equation, independent variable
Replies
6
Views
3K
MHB Solving Cubic Equations using Origami
Replies
1
Views
4K
Change of variables of differential equation
Replies
1
Views
2K
I How did the author transform the original equation into the Legendre equation?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Independent/dependent variable and modeling equations
Replies
4
Views
3K
Engineering Concrete Slab Deflection Using Partial Differential Equations
Replies
11
Views
2K
MHB How can the variables m, n, s, and t be solved for these equations?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Confusion about the independent variable of function in magnetostaics.
Replies
26
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top