Curl of tensor * non-constant vector

refind
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I know by definition that if T is a 2nd order tensor and v is a vector,
curl(Tv)=curl(T)v

but what if instead of constant vector v, I have w=grad(u), not constant but obviously an irrotational vector field. Is this still true:
curl(Tw)=curl(T)w ?

My guess is yes since curl(w)=0 but have no verification. Please advise. Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with index notation? If not I suggest learning it because it will make your tensor equations much more straightforward to interpret.

To answer your question, the answer will not depend on curl(w). The vector structure of the curl operator is not directly affecting w, since the w is contracted with one of the tensor indices.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top