Curl of the Polarization (Electrostatics)

AI Thread Summary
In electrostatics, the curl of the polarization vector is zero in cases of symmetry, such as spherical, cylindrical, or plane symmetry, because the polarization is perpendicular to the boundary. This condition arises from the nature of symmetric homogeneous bodies, where the electric field and displacement can be directly derived from Gauss's law without needing to consider the curl. The discussion clarifies that in electrostatics, the absence of time-varying fields (∇x E = 0) leads to the conclusion that the curl of the polarization is also zero. The relationship D = E + P reinforces this understanding. Overall, symmetry simplifies the analysis of electric displacement in electrostatics.
ManuJulian
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been reading Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics" and I've got to this part where it says:

"When you are asked to compute the electric displacement, first look for symmetry. If the problem exhibits spherical, cylindrical, or plane symmetry, then you can get \vec{D}directly from Gauss's equation (for the displacement) in integral form. (Evidently in such cases ∇x\vec{P} is automatically zero, but since symmetry alone dictates the answer you're not really obliged to worry about the curl.)"

Now, why is it that the curl of the polarization is always zero in those cases where there is symmetry?

Is it just because in every case that exhibits symmetry the polarization is perpendicular to the boundary?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you considering electrostatics or electrodynamics?
In what sense do you mean 'symmetry': a symmetric homogenous body, or some sort of crystal symmetry?
 
Electrostatics. Symmetry meaning the first one, a symmetric homogeneous body.
 
Since ∇x E = -∂B/∂t = 0 for statics and D = E + P, the result immediately follows.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top