Curl of the Polarization (Electrostatics)

AI Thread Summary
In electrostatics, the curl of the polarization vector is zero in cases of symmetry, such as spherical, cylindrical, or plane symmetry, because the polarization is perpendicular to the boundary. This condition arises from the nature of symmetric homogeneous bodies, where the electric field and displacement can be directly derived from Gauss's law without needing to consider the curl. The discussion clarifies that in electrostatics, the absence of time-varying fields (∇x E = 0) leads to the conclusion that the curl of the polarization is also zero. The relationship D = E + P reinforces this understanding. Overall, symmetry simplifies the analysis of electric displacement in electrostatics.
ManuJulian
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been reading Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics" and I've got to this part where it says:

"When you are asked to compute the electric displacement, first look for symmetry. If the problem exhibits spherical, cylindrical, or plane symmetry, then you can get \vec{D}directly from Gauss's equation (for the displacement) in integral form. (Evidently in such cases ∇x\vec{P} is automatically zero, but since symmetry alone dictates the answer you're not really obliged to worry about the curl.)"

Now, why is it that the curl of the polarization is always zero in those cases where there is symmetry?

Is it just because in every case that exhibits symmetry the polarization is perpendicular to the boundary?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you considering electrostatics or electrodynamics?
In what sense do you mean 'symmetry': a symmetric homogenous body, or some sort of crystal symmetry?
 
Electrostatics. Symmetry meaning the first one, a symmetric homogeneous body.
 
Since ∇x E = -∂B/∂t = 0 for statics and D = E + P, the result immediately follows.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top