Current carrying wire and Earth’s magnetic field directions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the resultant magnetic fields at a point 4 cm below a telephone cable with four wires carrying a current of 1 ampere east to west. The magnetic field due to the wires is determined to be 2x10^-5 T, while the Earth's magnetic field components are calculated as 3.19x10^-5 T horizontally and 2.24x10^-5 T vertically. The right-hand rule indicates that the magnetic field above the wires points into the plane, while below it points out. The participant expresses difficulty visualizing the Earth's magnetic field directions, especially with varying angles of dip. Visual aids are suggested as helpful tools for understanding these concepts better.
Qaztgbe
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A telephone cable at a place has 4 long straight horizontal wires carrying a current of 1 ampere in the same direction east to west. The Earth's magnetic field at the place is .39G, the angle of dip is 35°, and the magnetic declination is nearly zero. What are the resultant magnetic fields (magnitude and direction) at points 4cm below the cable?


Homework Equations


μI/2∏r


The Attempt at a Solution


Magnitude of the field due to the current carrying wires is 2x10-5T
Components of the earth’s magnetic fields –
Along the horizontal is BHcos35° = 3.19x10-5T
Along the vertical is BVsin35° = 2.24x10-5T

According to the right hand rule the magnetic field above the wires should be going into the plane and below should be coming out. I can’t ‘visualise’ the directions of the Earth's magnetic field so I can’t go any further.


I have numerous questions like this one but I can never see the direction of the earth’s field when it has different angles of dip.
 

Attachments

  • 2.bmp
    2.bmp
    186.4 KB · Views: 532
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This diagram may help you.
 

Attachments

Definitely helped. If only I could 'see' it for myself everytime I get one of these questions. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top