Current flow in a two source circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding current flow in a two-source circuit. Participants clarify that current should be treated as confined to individual loops for analysis, despite some current potentially flowing in other loops. The importance of defining loop currents for solving circuit equations is emphasized, with the need to treat them as separate for calculation purposes. A participant expresses their lack of knowledge about solving current loops, indicating they are preparing for university studies. The conversation concludes with a reminder that the number of sources or loops does not change the fundamental approach to analyzing circuit currents.
xJJx
Messages
56
Reaction score
2
Hi guys, is the current flow in this picture correct? I'm trying to understand current flow in a two source circuit.
 

Attachments

  • thumbnail_IMG_8713.jpg
    thumbnail_IMG_8713.jpg
    29 KB · Views: 454
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can you post a better version of your picture? Take it without any shadows over the paper, and rotate and process it a bit to make it easy to read.
 
Here's a better picture
 

Attachments

  • thumbnail_FullSizeRender.jpg
    thumbnail_FullSizeRender.jpg
    39.3 KB · Views: 505
Thanks. The circuit might be okay, but how are you setting the current of the left voltage source to 5A? What are the values of the resistances?
 
berkeman said:
Thanks. The circuit might be okay, but how are you setting the current of the left voltage source to 5A? What are the values of the resistances?
Hi, thanks for your reply :) The question doesn't tell me the resistance values, it just tells me everything stated on the picture. I thought current travels from positive terminals to negative, so I guessed the current flow directions to be like this ^. Is this correct?
 
xJJx said:
so I guessed the current flow directions to be like this ^. Is this correct?
Partly.

Pink current doesn't flow in the right loop and green current doesn't flow in the left loop.
 
  • Like
Likes xJJx
cnh1995 said:
Partly.

Pink current doesn't flow in the right loop and green current doesn't flow in the left loop.
haha I read that in Sheldon's voice & please may you explain why?
 
xJJx said:
haha I read that in Sheldon's voice & please may you explain why?
When you define loop current they should be confined to individual loops. This doesn't mean part of each current doesn't flow in the other loop but you can't solve for values without specific loop currents.
 
xJJx said:
haha I read that in Sheldon's voice & please may you explain why?
You have 5A flowing from the battery (pink) and 6A through the middle resistor. So, the remaining 1A (green) must be supplied by the rightmost current source. Hence, both 5A and 1A are confined to their respective loops. They add up in the middle branch and again split at the bottom node such that the pink current flows back to the battery and the green current flows back to the current source.
 
  • Like
Likes xJJx
  • #10
cnh1995 said:
You have 5A flowing from the battery (pink) and 6A through the middle resistor. So, the remaining 1A (green) must be supplied by the rightmost current source. Hence, both 5A and 1A are confined to their respective loops. They add up in the middle branch and again split at the bottom node such that the pink current flows back to the battery and the green current flows back to the current source.
But even if the two currents are confined to their respective loops, that still doesn't mean part of them can't flow in the other loops. So I still don't understand why they don't split at the bottom junction.
 
  • #11
xJJx said:
But even if the two currents are confined to their respective loops, that still doesn't mean part of them can't flow in the other loops.
Yes, that's exactly what I said in post #8

So I still don't understand why they don't split at the bottom junction.
You PRETEND that they are totally separate currents so that you can solve for them, Again, this is what I already explained in post #8. What is it about that that is not clear? How would YOU solve for values if you mix everything up the way you seem to want to? Do you understand how to solve current loops?
 
  • #12
phinds said:
Yes, that's exactly what I said in post #8

You PRETEND that they are totally separate currents so that you can solve for them, Again, this is what I already explained in post #8. What is it about that that is not clear? How would YOU solve for values if you mix everything up the way you seem to want to? Do you understand how to solve current loops?
No, I haven't learned how to solve current loops. I haven't started university yet, I'm trying to learn this stuff before uni starts. I know how current flows in a single-source circuit, but not in a two-source circuit.
 
  • #13
phinds said:
Yes, that's exactly what I said in post #8

You PRETEND that they are totally separate currents so that you can solve for them, Again, this is what I already explained in post #8. What is it about that that is not clear? How would YOU solve for values if you mix everything up the way you seem to want to? Do you understand how to solve current loops?
Is the 'currents confined to their respective loops' thing just an assumption we make for determining the loop currents in the circuit? do we ALWAYS make this assumption for two-source circuits, even when we're not trying to determine loop currents?
 
  • #14
xJJx said:
Is the 'currents confined to their respective loops' thing just an assumption we make for determining the loop currents in the circuit? do we ALWAYS make this assumption for two-source circuits, even when we're not trying to determine loop currents?
The number of sources is irrelevant and the number of loops is irrelevant. You draw a single current around each loop, write the resulting equations, and solve. Elements that are common to two loops have a current which is the sum/difference of the two loop currents. Assumed direction of the loop currents is irrelevant. If you've made the "wrong" assumption you just get a negative answer.
 
Back
Top