Current flow model through a resistance field

AI Thread Summary
To calculate current density in a 2D rectangle with varying resistance and a known voltage drop, a localized form of Ohm's law is essential. Current density is a vector that depends on local resistivity, which varies across the surface. If resistivity is constant, the problem simplifies to solving Laplace's equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions. For non-constant resistivity, a generalized Laplace equation applies, requiring numerical methods for solutions. Exploring techniques like the Van der Pauw method can aid in calculating resistivity for complex shapes.
akyriazis
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone.

I thought about this problem the other day, but I don't know what theory I need to solve this problem.

Given a 2D rectangle with a known, varying resistance, and a known voltage drop across the length, how would one calculate the current density at each point on the surface. By intuition, the current should in general go in the direction of least resistance, but I also think there is probably a mechanism to prevent current from all flowing through the same place. Is this the right thinking?

I also would like to be able to numerically calculate this, but how to do this will be much clearer when I have an idea of the theory.

Is anyone able to point me in the right direction?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Akyriazis, :welcome:

The theory you need is a kind of localized form of Ohm's law. Resistance is an over-all property of a piece of material. And current through your rectangle an over-all result.
Resistivity and current density are the local equivalents. The first is a scalar ( a number, depending on position ) and the second is a vector (with a magnitude and components - in your case x- and y components).
Check out the link and see if you can write down the differential equations and the boundary conditions for your case.
 
If the resistivity is constant, the problem is equivalent to solving Laplace's equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions. If it isn't constant, you have an equation that looks like this:
##\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} = 0##
##\mathbf{J} = \sigma \nabla{V}##
##\nabla{\sigma} \cdot \nabla{V} + \sigma \nabla^2 V = 0##
##\sigma## is the reciprocal of the resistivity.
This is a generalized Laplace equation. It reduces to Laplace's equation for ##\nabla{\sigma}=0##
Unless you can exploit some kind of symmetry, you'll probably need numerical methods to solve this.
 
It might help you to look at Van der Pauw technique for calculating resistivity for arbitrary shapes.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top