Current peak time in RLC circuit?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the peak time of current in an RLC circuit, with an emphasis on the circuit behaving like an LR circuit due to the capacitor's negligible effect. The time constant is calculated as 4.9 milliseconds. The use of differential equations and Laplace transforms is suggested to derive the current function, leading to a peak time of approximately 0.000161 seconds. Participants also emphasize the importance of formatting for clarity in complex calculations. The conversation highlights both the mathematical approach and the need for better communication in technical discussions.
hobbs125
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
I am trying to figure out how to calculate the time at which current will peak in the following circuit.

RLC132.png


Seems to me the capacitor will have no effect and the circuit will become a basic LR circuit in which the time constant is: 10/10010=.00099 x 5 = 4.9mS. Is this correct?

Any help will be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
hobbs125 said:
I am trying to figure out how to calculate the time at which current will peak in the following circuit.

RLC132.png


Seems to me the capacitor will have no effect and the circuit will become a basic LR circuit in which the time constant is: 10/10010=.00099 x 5 = 4.9mS. Is this correct?

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Write the differential equation for the current, and solve it with the boundary condition of the switch closing at t=0.
 
If we use Laplace transform we can write the Laplace impedance of the capacity ZC=1/(s*C1) and R2 will be
Z12=ZC*R2/(ZC+R2)=R2/(s*C1)/(1/(s*C1)+R2)=R2/(1+R2*C1*s)
Then the i(s)=V1/s/[L1*s+R1+R2/(1+R2*C1*s)]
i(s)=V1*(1+R2*C1*s)/[ R2*C1*L1*s^3+(L1+R1*R2*C1)*s^2+(R1+R2)*s]
If R2*C1*L1*s^3+(L1+R1*R2*C1)*s^2+(R1+R2)*s=0 we get s3=0;s1,s2
Let’s put :
a= R2*C1*L1 ; b= (L1+R1*R2*C1); c=R1+R2
a=10000*5/10^9*10=0.0005; b=(10+10*10000*5/10^7)= 10.05; c=10+10000=10010.
Then a*s^2+b*s+c=0
s1=[-b+sqrt(b^2-4*a*c)]/(2*a) s2=[-b-sqrt(b^2-4*a*c)]/(2*a)
s1= -1056.787 ; s2= -18944.21
i(s)=V1*(1+R2*C1*s)/[a*(s-s1)*(s-s2)*s]=U(s)/[s*W(s)]
U(s)=V1*(1+R2*C1*s)/a ;
W(s)=(s-s2)*(s-s1)=s^2-(s1+s2)*s+s1*s2
W’(s)=2*s-(s1+s2)
Transforming in i(t):
i(t)=U(0)/W(0)+U(s1)/W’(s1)/s1*exp(s1*t)+ U(s2)/W’(s2)/s2*exp(s2*t)
Substituting s1 and s2 we get:
U(0)=V1/a =10/.0005 = 20000 ; W(0)=s1*s2= 20020000
U(s1)= 18943.21 ; U(s2)= 1055.787 ;W’(s1)= s1-s2 ; W’(s2)= s2-s1
The maximum it is t for di(t)/dt=0
di(t)/dt= U(s1)/W’(s1) *exp(s1*t)+ U(s2)/W’(s2) *exp(s2*t)=0
exp((s1-s2)*t)= U(s2)/W’(s2)*W’(s1)/U(s2)
tmax=ln(U(s1)/U(s2))/(s1-s2)=ln(18943.21 /1055.787)/( -1056.787 -( -18944.21))
tmax= 0.000161 sec
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Sorry, I did not remark berkeman’s answer. It could be simpler, I guess.
i=total current; i1=capacitor current ; i2 = current through R2
V1=L1*di/dt+R1*i +R2*i2 first circuit
R2*di2/dt=-(L1*d2i/dt2+R1*di/dt)
integral(i1/C1*dt)=R2*i2 second circuit
i1/C1=R2*di2/dt ; i1=C1*R2*di2/dt; i1=-C1*(L1*d2i/dt2+R1*di/dt)
i=i1+ i2 i2=i-i1
i2=i+C1* (L1*d2i/dt2+R1*di/dt) then:
V1=L1*di/dt+R1*i +R2*[ i+C1* (L1*d2i/dt2+R1*di/dt) ] or:
R2*C1*L1*d2i/dt+(L1+R2*C1*R1)*di/dt+(R1+R2)*i=V1
a=R2*C1*L1 ; b=(L1+R2*C1*R1) ; c=(R1+R2)
ax^2+bx+c=0
x1=[-b+sqrt(b^2-4*a*c)]/(2*a)
x2=[-b-sqrt(b^2-4*a*c)]/(2*a)
x1= -1056.787 ; x2= -18944.21
i(t)=A*exp(x1*t)+B*exp(x2*t)+C
Since both x1 and x2 < 0 then for t=infinite C=V1/(R1+R2)
d2(i(t))/dt=x1^2*A*exp(x1*t)+x2^2*B* exp(x2*t)
If i(0)=0 then A+B+C=0 A+B=-C
If i(0)=0 then i2(0)=0 [at t=0]
i2=i+C1* (L1*d2i/dt2+R1*di/dt)
Then C1* (L1*d2i/dt2+R1*di/dt) =0
di/dt= x1*A*exp(x1*t)+x2*B*exp(x2*t)
d2i/dt2= x1^2*A*exp(x1*t)+x2^2*B*exp(x2*t) and
L1*d2i/dt2+R1*di/dt= L1*[A*x1^2+B*x2^2]+R1*[A*x1+B*x2]=0 or:
A*[L1*x1^2+R1*x1]+B*[L1*x2^2+R1*x2]=0 B/A=- (L1*x1^2+R1*x1)/( L1*x2^2+R1*x2)
B/A= -0.003109093
In order to find the maximum :
di/dt= x1*A*exp(x1*t)+x2*B*exp(x2*t)=0
x1*A*exp(x1*t)=-x2*B*exp(x2*t) -B/A=x1/x2*[exp(x2-x1)*t]
[exp(x2-x1)*t]=-B/A*x2/x1
tmax=ln(-x2/x1*B/A)/(x2-x1)=ln(18944.21/1056.787* 0.003109093) /( (18944.21-1056.787)= 0.000161 sec.
 
@Babadag -- your help is certainly appreciated, but it would help if you could format your replies in a more readable fashion. White space between paragraphs and equations helps a lot, and if you could post your equations in LaTeX, that would be even better (see the Feedback forum for a tutorial on LaTeX). :smile:
 
Thank you, berkeman, for your appreciation and your advice. From now I’ll try to prepare my post in La Text.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top