Curve Intersection of Surfaces in 3D: Solving for the Parametric Equations

MarcL
Messages
170
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Show that x=sin(t),y=cos⁡(t),z=sin^2 (t) is the curve of intersection of the surfaces z=x^2 and x^2+y^2=1.


Homework Equations



I don't think there aren't really any equations relevant for this maybe except the unit circle..?

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to equate both equation, I remember one problem very vaguely where we replaced the x^2 variable with s but I doubt this is what I have to do. Any insights on how to start this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MarcL said:

Homework Statement


Show that x=sin(t),y=cos⁡(t),z=sin^2 (t) is the curve of intersection of the surfaces z=x^2 and x^2+y^2=1.

Homework Equations



I don't think there aren't really any equations relevant for this maybe except the unit circle..?

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to equate both equation, I remember one problem very vaguely where we replaced the x^2 variable with s but I doubt this is what I have to do. Any insights on how to start this problem?

x^2+y^2=1 tells you that you are on the unit circle for x and y. You can certainly parameterize that as x=sin(t), y=cos(t). Why? Then you just have to figure out what z is in terms of t. I really don't think there is much substance to this problem. Why are you confused?
 
first of all wouldn't it be x=cos(t) and y= sin(t) I mean isn't that what it is on a unit circle? and whoops I just understood what you meant by z, after I figured out x, just plug it in so z=sin^2(t)
 
MarcL said:
first of all wouldn't it be x=cos(t) and y= sin(t) I mean isn't that what it is on a unit circle? and whoops I just understood what you meant by z, after I figured out x, just plug it in so z=sin^2(t)

x=sin(t) and y=cos(t) is just as good a parmetrization of the unit circle as x=cos(t) and y=sin(t). Tell me why?
 
I thought so because x=1 at t=0 well I thought so but you're right it doesn't change anything when I think about it. So i just put it in this form of parametric equation to just satisfy my first equation?
 
MarcL said:
I thought so because x=1 at t=0 well I thought so but you're right it doesn't change anything when I think about it. So i just put it in this form of parametric equation to just satisfy my first equation?

Yes, that's the way to show this parametrization works. x=cos(t), y=sin⁡(t), z=cos(t)^2 is also a good (but different) parametrization of the same intersection.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top