A Custodial Symmetry in the Standard Model

Luca_Mantani
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
Hi,
I am reading about this symmetry but I'm struggling to have a deep understanding of it. Would somebody please explain this symmetry to me from a conceptual point of view?

Thanks in advance,
Luca
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Luca_Mantani said:
Hi,
I am reading about this symmetry but I'm struggling to have a deep understanding of it. Would somebody please explain this symmetry to me from a conceptual point of view?

Thanks in advance,
Luca

The question seems to me to general. Due you have a more specific question?
A few basics:

Custodial symmetry is a symmetry that is respected by the SU(2) gauge interactions and the higgs self potential. It is not respected by the U(1) hypercharge interactions and yukawa terms for the fermions.
It extends the SU(2)L in the standard model to SU(2)LxSU(2)R (global symmetry only). After electroweak symmetry breaking(EWSB) ,
SU(2)LxSU(2)R\rightarrowSU(2)L+R. This residual symmetry after EWSB is usually referred to as the "custodial" symmetry.

The three SU(2)L Gauge bosons (W\pm,W3) form a triplet under this symmetry, and thus their masses are equal in the approximation that the symmetry is valid. The deviation from that is due to hypercharge and yukawa terms.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and vanhees71
ofirg said:
The question seems to me to general. Due you have a more specific question?
A few basics:

Custodial symmetry is a symmetry that is respected by the SU(2) gauge interactions and the higgs self potential. It is not respected by the U(1) hypercharge interactions and yukawa terms for the fermions.
It extends the SU(2)L in the standard model to SU(2)LxSU(2)R (global symmetry only). After electroweak symmetry breaking(EWSB) ,
SU(2)LxSU(2)R\rightarrowSU(2)L+R. This residual symmetry after EWSB is usually referred to as the "custodial" symmetry.

The three SU(2)L Gauge bosons (W\pm,W3) form a triplet under this symmetry, and thus their masses are equal in the approximation that the symmetry is valid. The deviation from that is due to hypercharge and yukawa terms.
In which sense this is a "approximate" symmetry? How can a symmetry be approximate?
 
Luca_Mantani said:
In which sense this is a "approximate" symmetry? How can a symmetry be approximate?

In the sense that it is not respected by some terms in the Lagrangian. The symmetry is only present when those terms are neglected.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and Luca_Mantani
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top