Cutting force (large astronomical body)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicholas0211510
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Cutting Force
AI Thread Summary
Cutting a large astronomical body like the Moon in half would require immense energy, surpassing the gravitational forces that would pull the two halves back together. A blade, even made of the hardest material and moving at high speeds, would not be sufficient for this task. Instead, a giant wedge would be necessary to separate the hemispheres, but this would result in crushing rather than a clean cut. The feasibility of such an endeavor is highly questionable, as the gravitational pull would likely prevent successful separation. The discussion highlights the complexities and challenges associated with this hypothetical scenario.
nicholas0211510
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I know this is a weird topic but the thought has pestered me lately. How much energy would it take to cut a large astronomical body in half (assuming its a uniform sphere). Let's say a object the size of the moon with the same overall density of the moon.

Say the blade used to cut it is as hard as the strongest matiral known and its 1 mm thick moving at speeds needed to cut through it faster than the gravity can pull the other hemisphere back together (I don't know the exact speed needed) and what formula would associate with calculating this.

Sorry if isn't specific enough I my self am not sure how to explain my question any further, thank you in advanced :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't cut it fast enough that the hemispheres won't pull back together. You'd have to use a giant wedge that forced the hemispheres apart and that would cause as much crushing as cutting. Basically I don't think it can be done. Why do you need to know? What's the really issue?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes nicholas0211510
I really have no true reason, it just has been a burning question for some reason, and thank you for clarifying this :)
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top