Cycloid Lagrangian Homework - 2 Degrees of Freedom & Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter spacetimedude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian
spacetimedude
Messages
87
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A point like particle of mass m moves under gravity along a cycloid given in parametric form by
$$x=R(\phi+\sin\phi),$$
$$y=R(1-cos\phi),$$
where R is the radius of the circle generating the cycloid and ##\phi## is the parameter (angle). The particle is released at the point (##x=\pi R, y=2R##) from rest.

1) What types of constraint apply to this system and how many degrees of freedom are needed to describe the motion?

2) Show that the lagrangian of the system is
$$L=2mR^2\dot{\phi}\cos^2\frac{\phi}{2}-2mgR\sin^2\frac{\phi}{2}$$

3) Introduce a new generalised coordinate ##s=4Rsin\frac{\phi}{2}## and express the Lagrangian in terms of s.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


1) I am not sure what the constraints are. It's just that the particle is forced to move in a cycloid. Could someone help me here?
The degrees of freedom is 2 since x and y are dependent on R and ##\phi##. So R and ##\phi## are the variables required.

2) The lagrangian is L=T-V.
Am I correct in thinking ##T=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot x^2+\dot y^2)##? I have tried taking the time derivative of the right hand side of the given equations of x and y. I got $$\dot x=R(\dot \phi+\dot \phi \cos\phi),$$
$$\dot y=R(\dot \phi \sin\phi).$$
Substituting into T, $$T=R^2m\dot \phi ^2 (1+cos\phi).$$
Similarly, $$V=mgy=mgR(1-\cos\phi)$$
Then $$L=R^2m\dot \phi ^2 (1+cos\phi)-mgR(1-\cos\phi)$$
I'm looking through the double angle formulas and can't really determine how to get to the given lagrangian.

3) What to do?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Is R a degree of freedom? If it is, where are the derivatives of R in 2?

2) Just apply the double angle formula and the trigonometric one.

3) It is a variable substitution. What is your problem with it?
 
1) Is R a degree of freedom? If it is, where are the derivatives of R in 2?
Sorry, I realized I initially had R as a degree of freedom but after taking the derivative, it became too complex I figured R is not a degree of freedom. This makes sense because it's just the radius of a circle. So one degree of freedom, ##\psi##

2) Just apply the double angle formula and the trigonometric one.
Okay

3) It is a variable substitution. What is your problem with it?
I don't know where to substitute? Should I solve for R, so ##R=\frac{s}{4\sin\frac{\phi}{2}}## and plug it in the x and y equation?
 
spacetimedude said:

Homework Statement


1) What types of constraint apply to this system

The Attempt at a Solution


1) I am not sure what the constraints are. It's just that the particle is forced to move in a cycloid. Could someone help me here?
I'm not sure exactly what the question is asking here. But standard texts often categorize constraints using scary words. For example, have you run into the terms "holonomic", "nonholonomic", "scleronomous", and "rheonomous"?

(I studied Lagrangian mechanics in 1970 and this is the first chance that I've ever had to use any of those words. Thanks for the opportunity. :oldsmile: )
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top