Cyclotron Frequency of a Hydrogen Atom in a Field B

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the cyclotron frequency of a hydrogen atom in a magnetic field B, focusing on the torque experienced by the electron. The equations presented derive the cyclotron frequency, showing that for orbital motion, the frequency is given by ω_p = qB/(2m) with g=1. The user notes a similarity between this result and the frequency derived from considering a single electron, ω = qB/m, despite the factor of 2 difference. The inquiry seeks to understand whether there is a deeper connection between these two cases or if the similarity is merely coincidental. The conversation highlights the importance of the ratio qB/m in obtaining correct dimensional analysis.
jackychenp
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

For a hydrogen atom in the field B, torque on the electron is \tau =\mu Bsin\theta =\omega_pJsin\theta => \omega_p=gqB/(2m) If we only consider orbital motion (ignore spin), then g=1. So \omega_p=qB/(2m). (It follows the steps from Feynman's lectures VII section 34-3)
For a single electron in the field, qvB=v^2m/r => \omega=qB/m. I know these two cases are different, but why the results look the same (only a factor of 2 different). Is there any connection between them, or just coincidence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Getting the dimensions to come out right requires the ratio qB/m.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top