Cylindrical Halbach array with a vertical magnetic field?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and implications of using a cylindrical Halbach array with a vertical magnetic field, particularly in applications such as electric trains. Participants explore the magnetic field arrangements, potential configurations, and the effectiveness of Halbach arrays compared to traditional magnets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the possibility of wrapping a planar Halbach array into a cylinder while maintaining its magnetic properties.
  • Others argue that a cylindrical Halbach array would not produce the same magnetic field as a linear one, suggesting that it would require magnetic monopoles.
  • A participant mentions the geometry of the magnets used in conical loudspeakers and questions the intended application of the proposed array.
  • One participant expresses interest in using a Halbach array to enhance the speed of an electric train without increasing weight, citing the array's ability to provide doubled magnetic strength.
  • There are discussions about the orientation of the poles in the Halbach array and how they relate to the magnetic flux and net force in the system.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the advantages of using a Halbach array, questioning whether it would outperform traditional magnets in this context.
  • A participant highlights the need for cylindrical Halbach arrays with poles oriented to face into the page, as opposed to upward, to fit within the design constraints of their application.
  • Concerns are raised about the utility of Halbach arrays, with some suggesting that they merely redirect flux rather than improve performance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the effectiveness and configuration of cylindrical Halbach arrays. There is no consensus on whether these arrays will provide a significant advantage over traditional magnetic configurations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the specific geometries and configurations needed for optimal performance, as well as the assumptions underlying their claims about magnetic flux and force generation.

rayjbryant
Messages
23
Reaction score
6
1593021699307.png
Similar to what is shown here, except the south side would be the weak side of the array.

A link to purchase one of these or at least the magnetic field arrangement would be very helpful. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. It would require magnetic monopoles. Linear Holbach arrays alternate poles.
 
1593025152833.png
So if I took this array and wrapped it into a cylinder I wouldn't get the same magnetic field?

That is, take the ends and connect them, with the strong and weak sides maintained in their current position.
 
The same field as what? You could make an annular ring with an open center and many alternating poles yes.
That is not what you had drawn!
 
IMG_20200624_150731.jpg
 
The magnet on the right is exactly the geometry at the base of any conical loudspeaker. The field goes into the page at the center and out at the periphery. The magnet is annular with axial field and there is a soft magnetic plate with center "axle" and backing plate to complete the "magnetic circuit". What are you trying to make?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
worlds simplest electric train

I'd like to try this experiment but with a halbach array to see if I can increase the speed without increasing weight. The doubled strength of a halbach array, along with the fact that the magnetic field is already unbalanced means I can have a lighter more compact magnet (array) on each end.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and hutchphd
So I guess what I am asking is if I could make the desired halbach array simply by wrapping a planar array.
 
That is fantastic video...I've not seen that trick before.
Not sure I understand your plan though. The fields from those permanent magnets already is axial as is the field from the coil. Plus each end of the battery "car" actually gives forward thrust. I don't understand your picture of the "existing magnet" field.
Great stuff.
 
  • #10
IMG_20200624_155648.jpg
 
  • #11
The strong side would be where the greatest magnetic flux density from the coil is which would create a net force. The fact that the halbach array can be more compact and deliver twice the magnetic field strength would make this a more efficient machine.
 
  • #12
IMG_20200624_161134.jpg
IMG_20200624_161142.jpg
 
  • #13
If I understand the physics here the front and back magnets must be in the same direction (NSbatteryNS) not (NSbatterySN).
If that is true Halbach array is not what you want here. All the leaky flux is your friend.
 
  • #14
For this to work properly the arrangement is (NSbatterySN) since one of the poles must be exposed to more flux to create a net force.

at 3:50 it is explained
 
  • #15
I stand corrected...what an interesting system.
But i still do not know what you want . What does the "undesirable" geometry picture represent? The magnets as purchased already look like the "desirable" geometry in your picture (the flat ends are pole faces).
 
  • #16
The cylindrical halbach arrays I'm finding have their poles oriented so that they point upward and not into the page. This poses a problem because a sideways cylinder will not fit in the coil. I need cylindrical halbach arrays that behave similar to a cylindrical magnet, with their pole facing into the page.
IMG_20200624_214200.jpg
 
  • #17
rayjbryant said:
The cylindrical halbach arrays I'm finding
Can you please specify??
And why do you think an array will do any better here?? They are not necessarilly better...they just redirect flux...with this symmetry I don't see the utility. Convince me.
 
  • #18
an example

I believe the performance will be improved because rather than wasting magnetic flux on the outer facing poles, it is redirected towards the middle where it will push back harder against the solenoid field, which according to Newtons third law will cause a greater force.
 
  • #19
You do realize that thing is two inches in diameter? I am impressed by the uniformity of the interior field however.
My attempts to make these arrays do anything particularly useful have been singularly unimpressive. I think the highest flux density face pole magnets will better serve you. And perhaps a more conical pole face. I just do not see how to make a Halbach geometry do anything like what you want.
So thanks for the question...what a great toy!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K