Cylindrical section is an ellipse?

uman
Messages
348
Reaction score
1
Prove or disprove: The intersection of the plane x+y+z=1 and the cylinder x^2+y^2=1 is an ellipse.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you perform a change of variables so that the x+y+z=1 plane is the new 'x-y plane' then do you not get a new equation for your cylinder? You can then work it out by setting the new 'z' to zero?
 
The intersection of the two figures is the values of (x, y, z) that satisfy both equations simutaneously so solve the two equations simultaneously: From the first equation, y= 1- x- z. What do you get when you replace y by that in your second equation?
 
Thanks for the help... I actually found a (more general) proof in a geometry textbook (Geometry and the Imagination by David Hilbert)
 
It would have to be an ellipse because the plane isn't parallel to the cylinder. The normal vector is i+j+k which makes an angle of cos\alpha =\frac{1}{\sqrt3} with all three axes.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top