D'alembert's solution to the wave equation, on Chain Rule

kougou
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Please have a look at the picture attach, which shows the proof of the D'alembert's solution to the wave equation. If you can't open the open,
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=54937&stc=1&d=1358917223

click onto this link:http://www-solar.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~alan/MT2003/PDE/node12.html

The part I have problem is the taking the second paritial derivative of u with respect to x.
Ux=du/dz+du/dn, does this mean that Ux is a function of z and n, that is, Ux(z,n), and z(x,t) and n(x,t)?

so later when I taken the second derivative, then I apply chain rule?

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • capture__.jpg
    capture__.jpg
    14.9 KB · Views: 1,390
Physics news on Phys.org
hi kougou! :smile:

(try using the Quick Symbols box next to the Reply box :wink:)
kougou said:
The part I have problem is the taking the second paritial derivative of u with respect to x.
Ux=du/dz+du/dn, does this mean that Ux is a function of z and n, that is, Ux(z,n), and z(x,t) and n(x,t)?

so later when I taken the second derivative, then I apply chain rule?

i'm not really following your question :confused:

∂u/∂x can be considered either a function of x and y, or a function of ζ and η

since you want a final result in terms of ζ and η, you'll have to convert the derivatives wrt x and y into derivatives wrt ζ and η (and yes, you use the chain rule)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top