Damn you, Otto Stern and Walther Gerlach

Onamor
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The last (8 mark) part of this (also in attachment):
[URL]http://img189.imageshack.us/i/imag0095l.jpg/[/URL]

(very sorry for having to post an image, I spent a good hour trying to tex it in this, but there's something wrong with my parsing in the preview post. anyway...)

Homework Equations


the answer to the penultimate part (the 4 marker) is the "up" spin has 0.82 and the "down" has 0.18 relative intensity.

The Attempt at a Solution


Using \hat{S}_{y}=hbar/2\sigma_{y} you can solve the eigenequation \sigma_{y}|\chi> = \lambda|\chi> to find the eigenstates of \hat{S}_{y} in terms of \alpha and \beta:

|+>y = 1/\sqrt{2} (|\alpha>y + i|\beta>y) and

|->y = 1/\sqrt{2} (|\alpha>y - i|\beta>y)
But these are pretty standard results...
They are the states that spin in the +y and -y directions (please correct me if I am wrong on that). Do I just take y<+|\alpha> and y<-|\alpha>and get the coefficients for the two beams?

Whether or not i then need to multiple by the intensities found in the part beforehand is another question... (I know intensity != probability but it seems sensible?..)

Ultra thanks to anyone who can help -Im revising for my finals :)

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMAG0095.jpg
    IMAG0095.jpg
    40.7 KB · Views: 661
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
you need to take each of the possible beams in the previous question which have states \left| \Psi_i \right\rangle say and contract them with the +y eigenstate to get a coefficient. The previous intensities can be discarded
 
Thanks, i think I've done it now with your help. Each beam has 50/50 probability as you would expect. thanks again.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top