De Broglie Wavelength and Relativistic Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the energy threshold at which the nonrelativistic calculation of an electron's de Broglie wavelength becomes inaccurate by 5%. Participants clarify that the error arises from using classical momentum (mv) instead of relativistic momentum (gamma*mv). The concept of gamma, which accounts for increased inertia at high velocities, is highlighted as crucial for solving the problem. There is confusion regarding the application of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in this context, as the uncertainty in position is not known. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of incorporating relativistic effects for accurate calculations in high-energy scenarios.
Jacob87411
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
Due to time constraints in AP physics we had to skip the chapter on realitivity and now we have problems in the next chapter that request us to use relativity:

At what energy will the nonrelativistic calculation of the de Broglie wavelength of an electron be in error by 5%?

Any help on exactly what this is even asking would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Error of 5% in calculation can be in calculation of 'mv' or momentum of electron as h is a constant .

According to me this is not a problem which has anything to do with relativity as the question says 'nonrelativistic' calculation.

as : mv = root of (2mE)

where m=mass of electron

here error will be in calculation of velocity .Use Heisenberg's principle

dx.dp>h/2pie
 
The HUP reads

\Delta x^{i}\Delta p_{j}\geq\frac{\hbar}{2}\delta^{i}_{j}

,but i don't see any to apply it,since u don't know the uncertainty in the position...

Daniel.
 
Dr. Brain & dextercioby,

I think the 5% error they're talking about is the error resulting from using the classical momentum, mv, rather than the relativistic momentum, gamma*mv. Doesn't that seem right?

Jacob, gamma is the function of velocity that gives the increase in the inertia of an object when it is accelerated. This increase is one of the consequences of special relativity. Do you know the equation for gamma, or can you find it in the chapter on relativity that you skipped?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top