De Broglie wavelength, kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy of electrons based on their de Broglie wavelengths. For an electron with a wavelength of 0.63 Å, the kinetic energy is determined to be 379 eV. However, for a wavelength of 1.7 x 10^-15 m, the calculated kinetic energy of 5.217e11 eV is significantly off from the expected result. Participants emphasize the importance of considering relativistic effects when velocities approach the speed of light, suggesting that Newtonian methods may not be suitable for high-energy calculations. Understanding the relationship between kinetic energy, velocity, and the implications of relativistic physics is crucial for accurate results.
ajmCane22
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(a) Find the kinetic energy of an electron whose de Broglie wavelength is equal to 0.63 Å, a typical atomic size.

Ke = 379 eV

(b) Repeat part (a) for an electron with a wavelength equal to 1.7 x 10-15 m, a typical nuclear size.

Ke = _____eV


Homework Equations



Ke = h2 / λ2(2m)

The Attempt at a Solution



I got part (a), but for part be I calculated Ke = 5.217e11 which is "significantly different" from the correct answer. I tried getting help from Cramster and they provided me with the same answer. What am I doing wrong? Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check the velocity that you calculate. How does it compare to c?
 
I don't understand. I'm not calculating velocity? I'm calculating kinetic energy in Joules and converting it to eV. Where do c and v come in?
 
ajmCane22 said:
I don't understand. I'm not calculating velocity? I'm calculating kinetic energy in Joules and converting it to eV. Where do c and v come in?

When the energies get high enough the velocities will approach the speed of light. Then you need to take Relativistic effects into account. Check the velocity implied by the KE using Newtonian methods. If it's more than about 2/3 of c (or *gasp* greater than c!) you should be using the Relativistic formulas instead.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top