De Broglie wavelength of electron and proton

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the de Broglie wavelength of electrons and protons, emphasizing that the proton, having greater mass, will have a shorter wavelength than the electron when both have the same speed. Participants debate the appropriate use of different energy equations, specifically whether to apply the relativistic energy-momentum relation or the classical kinetic energy formula. Clarification is sought on the definitions of total energy versus kinetic energy and when to use each in calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding relativistic effects, particularly in distinguishing between rest mass and relativistic mass. The conclusion indicates that the interpretation of energy significantly affects the outcomes in calculations related to particle wavelengths.
Jahnavi
Messages
848
Reaction score
102

Homework Statement


De broglie.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



de Broglie wavelength λ of a particle = h /P

a) since mass of proton is more than electron and speed is same , momentum of proton is more . De Broglie wavelength of proton will be less .

b) wavelengths will be same .

c) Using P = √(2Km) . Since energy is same and mass of proton is more , it's momentum will be more . Hence wavelength of proton will be less .

Is that correct ?

I would like to know whether I should have used the relation E2 = P2c2 + m02c4 ?

When is the above relation valid ? Is it only when the particles are moving at the speed of light ?

I am not sure when are we supposed to use the above relation . Should we use the above relation or using P = √(2Km) was okay ?
 

Attachments

  • De broglie.jpg
    De broglie.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 1,331
Physics news on Phys.org
Jahnavi said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 227152I would like to know whether I should have used the relation E2 = P2c2 + m02c4 ?

When is the above relation valid ? Is it only when the particles are moving at the speed of light ?

I am not sure when are we supposed to use the above relation . Should we use the above relation or using P = √(2Km) was okay ?
It depends what did the problem mean on "energy". The total energy, or the kinetic energy.
In the formula E2 = P2c2 + m02c4 energy means the total energy of the particle, E=mc2=m0γc2.
And you know quite well, that particles with non-zero mass can not move with the speed of light.
When the speed of a particle is much less than that of the speed of light the kinetic energy KE=P2/2m. Otherwise, you should use the relativistic quantities and formulas.
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
ehild said:
It depends what did the problem mean on "energy". The total energy, or the kinetic energy.
In the formula E2 = P2c2 + m02c4 energy means the total energy of the particle, E=mc2=m0γc2.

How did you get E=mc2 ?

What is γ ?
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
Jahnavi said:
How did you get E=mc2 ?

Just to make it clear, ##m_{o}## is the actual mass of the particle, not ##m## which is just ##\gamma m_{o}##. Outdated books says ##m=\gamma m_{o}##, is the relativistic mass. "Don't use this term its wrong, and don't think of it as mass"

To get ##m=\gamma m_{o}##, write E as sum kinetic energy and rest energy and then substitute rest mass and kinetic energy (relativistic form). You will get the same answer as ehlid.
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
ehild said:
You never saw Einstein's famous equation E=mc2?

I have .

But I thought this was obtained from the formula E2 = P2c2 + m02c4 by putting P = 0 .

I thought E = mc2 was valid for a particle at rest i.e for a particle having zero momentum .
 
Phylosopher said:
To get ##m=\gamma m_{o}##, write E as sum kinetic energy and rest energy and then substitute rest mass and kinetic energy (relativistic form). You will get the same answer as ehlid.

Could you show me how you get this result .

What is rest energy ?
 
Jahnavi said:
I have .

But I thought this was obtained from the formula E2 = P2c2 + m02c4 by putting P = 0 .

I thought E = mc2 was valid for a particle at rest i.e for a particle having zero momentum .
Well, recently m means the rest mass (invariant mass) of the particle. When I studied relativity the rest mass was denoted by m0 and m was the relativistic mass. The formula E2 = P2c2 + m02c4 is not an axiom, it can be derived from the expression of energy and momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
Jahnavi said:
Could you show me how you get this result .

What is rest energy ?
m0c2.
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
  • #10
ehild said:
In the formula E2 = P2c2 + m02c4 energy means the total energy of the particle, E=mc2=

Are the two expressions equivalent ?

What should we put for P (momentum ) ?

Should it be mv ?

I am studying basics of photons , so I am quite hesitant to use mv for momentum for other particles as well .
 
  • #11
Jahnavi said:
Are the two expressions equivalent ?

What should we put for P (momentum ) ?

Should it be mv ?

I am studying basics of photons , so I am quite hesitant to use mv for momentum for other particles as well .
Other people say that I must not use the relativistic mass. So the momentum is P=mγv, and E=mγc2.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy–momentum_relation, "heuristic approach for massive particles"
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
  • #12
Jahnavi said:
Could you show me how you get this result .

$$E=E_{kinetic}+E_{rest}$$

let ##m_{o}## be the rest mass. Then rest energy and kinetic energy are as follow:

$$E_{kinetic}=(\gamma -1) m_{o} c^{2}$$
$$E_{rest}= m_{o}c^{2}$$

Thus ##E=\gamma m_{o} c^{2}##

Jahnavi said:
Are the two expressions equivalent ?

What should we put for P (momentum ) ?

Should it be mv ?

I am studying basics of photons , so I am quite hesitant to use mv for momentum for other particles as well .

From your questions, it seems that you didn't yet study relativity fully. Maybe you are starting your study on the subject? Look at the wiki links ehlid kindly provided.
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
  • #13
The question is not very specific in part (c). When it says the two particles have the same energy, they do not specify relativistic energy (with ## E^2=p^2c^2+m_o^2c^4 ##) or simply kinetic energy. I think it was a good observation on your part @Jahnavi that you recognized that there are two possibilities here. ## \\ ## The answer is different depending on which type of energy is implied.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi and Phylosopher
  • #14
Charles Link said:
The answer is different depending on which type of energy is implied.

In the OP in part c) I have assumed energy to be kinetic energy in which case the momentum of proton was more and wavelength smaller .

But if I consider energy to be relativistic energy in part c) , then momentum of photon comes out to be less and wavelength of proton is longer .

I hope you agree with this :smile:

Completely different result .

Interesting !
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top