De Moivres formula for multiple angles. Where does the sinus go?

mariush
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi!

Yesterday i read and mostly understood that (cos(\theta) + isin(\theta)^{n} = (cos(n\theta) + isin(n\theta)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay, so what is your question? What about the multiple angles that you mention in your title?

Note that the formula you give can be derived from the formula for multiplication of complex numbers in "polar form"- r_1(cos(\theta_1)+ i sin(\theta_1))r_2(cos(\theta_2)+ i sin(\theta_2))= (r_1r_2)(cos(\theta_1+ \theta_2)+ i sin(\theta_1+ \theta_2)).

Also, we can use Euler's formula, e^{ix}= cos(x)+ i sin(x) to write (cos(\theta)+ i sin(\theta))^n= cos(n\theta)+ i sin(n\theta) in the simpler form (e^{i\theta})^n= e^{i n\theta}.
 
Sorry, I'm not best friends with the post publisher today.

My question was about the multiple angles: I understand that
(cos x +i sinx)^{n} = cos (nx) + i*sin(nx). Then i read that cos (nx) = cos^{n}(x) - (nC2)cos^{n-2}x*sin^{2}(x)- ...-(-1)^{k/2}(nCk)cos^{n-k}(k)*sin^{k}(x)

Now, that looks a lot like what I would expect to get from cos (nx) + i*sin(nx) = (cos x +i sinx)^{n}, but i cannot figure out where the sin(nx) goes.

My first thought is that cos (nx) = (cos x +i sinx)^{n} - sin(nx)
 
HallsofIvy said:
Okay, so what is your question? What about the multiple angles that you mention in your title?

Note that the formula you give can be derived from the formula for multiplication of complex numbers in "polar form"- r_1(cos(\theta_1)+ i sin(\theta_1))r_2(cos(\theta_2)+ i sin(\theta_2))= (r_1r_2)(cos(\theta_1+ \theta_2)+ i sin(\theta_1+ \theta_2)).

Also, we can use Euler's formula, e^{ix}= cos(x)+ i sin(x) to write (cos(\theta)+ i sin(\theta))^n= cos(n\theta)+ i sin(n\theta) in the simpler form (e^{i\theta})^n= e^{i n\theta}.

Hi, and thanks for such a quick response! I'm sorry about the first post. Seems like I hit the submit rather than the preview button, a bit prematurely..
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top