De Moivre's Theorum and Double-Angle Formulas

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jessehk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas
Jessehk
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I hope this is in the right place.

I'm in grade 12, and I've been given an assignment involving complex numbers.

The question reads:

Use De Moivre's Theorum to verify the identities:
cos(2\theta) = cos^2\theta - sin^2\theta

sin(2\theta) = 2sin\theta cos\theta

I've tried something like this:
<br /> cos(2\theta) + i \cdot sin(2\theta) = (cos\theta + i \cdot sin\theta)^2<br />

<br /> cos(2\theta) + i \cdot sin(2\theta) = cos^2\theta + i \cdot 2cos\theta sin\theta - sin^2\theta<br />

<br /> cos(2\theta) = cos^2\theta - sin^2\theta + i \cdot 2cos\theta sin\theta - i \cdot sin(2\theta)<br />

But I don't understand where to go from there. Can I somehow "separate" them?
Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the two complex numbers

a+i\,b, \quad c+i\,d

are equal?
 
Rainbow Child said:
When the two complex numbers

a+i\,b, \quad c+i\,d

are equal?

I'm sorry, I don't understand.
 
The equation a+i\,b=c+i\,d gives

a=c,\, \quad b=d.

Apply this to your formulas
 
Rainbow Child said:
The equation a+i\,b=c+i\,d gives

a=c,\, \quad b=d.

Apply this to your formulas

Well, I didn't know that.
Thanks for the help. :)

EDIT: I just got it: I'm an idiot. Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top