DE - Solutions By Substitutions (algebraic manipulation problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nano-Passion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manipulation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an algebraic manipulation problem related to differential equations, specifically focusing on the transition between two steps in a mathematical expression involving functions M(1,u) and N(1,u).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion about the transition from Step A to Step B, questioning the algebraic manipulation involved. Some attempt to clarify the distribution of terms and the implications of parentheses in expressions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights and questioning each other's reasoning. There is a recognition of the importance of understanding distribution in algebra, and some participants are exploring different interpretations of the expressions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need for clarity in algebraic manipulation, particularly regarding the distribution of terms and the role of parentheses in expressions. Participants are navigating through potential misunderstandings without reaching a consensus on the specific steps involved.

Nano-Passion
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
0
I can't for the life of me understand how the book went from step A to step B--even though I realize its just a pesky algebraic manipulation.

Step A

[tex]M(1,u) dx +N(1,u)[u dx+ x du] = 0[/tex]

Step B

[tex][M(1,u) + uN(1,u) ]dx + xN(1,u)du = 0[/tex]

Step A to Step B? I tried factoring and tinkering around here and there but all was in vain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nano-Passion said:
I can't for the life of me understand how the book went from step A to step B--even though I realize its just a pesky algebraic manipulation.

Step A

[tex]M(1,u) dx +N(1,u)[u dx+ x du] = 0[/tex]

Step B

[tex][M(1,u) + uN(1,u) ]dx + xN(1,u)du = 0[/tex]

Step A to Step B? I tried factoring and tinkering around here and there but all was in vain.
You'll be embarrassed if we work it out for you !

[itex]M(1,u) dx +N(1,u)[u dx+ x du] = 0[/itex] → [itex]M(1,u) dx + u N(1,u) dx+ x N(1,u) du = 0[/itex]
 
SammyS said:
You'll be embarrassed if we work it out for you !

[itex]M(1,u) dx +N(1,u)[u dx+ x du] = 0[/itex] → [itex]M(1,u) dx + u N(1,u) dx+ x N(1,u) du = 0[/itex]


To me it just seems that you wrote step B in an extremely similar form. I don't understand how you got to that step either. There must be something I'm misinterpreting because it seems like your missing at least a couple terms (if you factor).
 
Nano-Passion said:
To me it just seems that you wrote step B in an extremely similar form. I don't understand how you got to that step either. There must be something I'm misinterpreting because it seems like your missing at least a couple terms (if you factor).
Distribute the N(1,u):
[itex]N(1,u)[u dx+ x du][/itex]​
 
SammyS said:
Distribute the N(1,u):
[itex]N(1,u)[u dx+ x du][/itex]​

I always thought one must distribute everything? Given how we have two polynomials, shouldn't you always foil? Take for example:

[tex](x+2)(x-2)[/tex] It wouldn't make sense to only distribute the 2 in the first bracket and say the expression is equal to
[tex]x+2x-4[/tex]
 
Nano-Passion said:
I always thought one must distribute everything? Given how we have two polynomials, shouldn't you always foil? Take for example:

[tex](x+2)(x-2)[/tex] It wouldn't make sense to only distribute the 2 in the first bracket and say the expression is equal to
[tex]x+2x-4[/tex]
Actually, that's [itex]x^2+2x-4[/itex]

but for your problem ...

a + b(c+e) is a + bc + be . --- Right ?

The a is M(1,u)dx ,

the b is N(1,u) ,

the c is u dx ,

and the e is x du
 
SammyS said:
Actually, that's [itex]x^2+2x-4[/itex]

I know it is x^2+2x-4. But I was saying that by your method it would have been x+2x-4.

a + b(c+e) is a + bc + be . --- Right ?

The a is M(1,u)dx ,

the b is N(1,u) ,

the c is u dx ,

and the e is x du

Your logic is spot on. But something is still bothering me.

a + b(c+e) is a + bc + be

The a is x
The b is +2
The c is x
The e is -2

So then it would follow
[tex]a+bc+be[/tex]
[tex]x+2x-4[/tex]

So What happened here? It doesn't come out to x^2+2x-4 like I was trying to say before.

The correct answer would have been ac+bc+be. I know what you said is consistent but something is being mixed up here.

Edit:

Maybe what makes the difference is that there aren't brackets aroudn the first two terms. So that

[tex](a+b) (c+e) ≠ a+b(c+e)[/tex]

Is this correct?
 
Nano-Passion said:
I always thought one must distribute everything? Given how we have two polynomials, shouldn't you always foil? Take for example:

[tex](x+2)(x-2)[/tex] It wouldn't make sense to only distribute the 2 in the first bracket and say the expression is equal to
[tex]x+2x-4[/tex]
I misread what you said here.

Yes, of course [itex](x+2)(x-2)[/itex] is the same as [itex]x^2+2x-4\ .[/itex]

What you have in this problem is more like [itex]x+2(x-2)\,,[/itex] which is indeed the same as [itex]x+2x-4\ .[/itex]

In Step A) of your original post, the M(1,u) does not get distributed through anything.
 
Last edited:
Nano-Passion said:
Maybe what makes the difference is that there aren't brackets aroudn the first two terms. So that

[tex](a+b) (c+e) ≠ a+b(c+e)[/tex]

Is this correct?

That's correct. Parentheses can make all the difference in an answer.
 
  • #10
SammyS said:
I misread what you said here.

Yes, of course [itex](x+2)(x-2)[/itex] is the same as [itex]x^2+2x-4\ .[/itex]

What you have in this problem is more like [itex]x+2(x-2)\,,[/itex] which is indeed the same as [itex]x+2x-4\ .[/itex]

In Step A) of your original post, the M(1,u) does not get distributed through anything.

Oh thanks!

Bohrok said:
That's correct. Parentheses can make all the difference in an answer.

Wow, that is a really important algebraic property to know. I find it funny that I learn it now while in differential equations! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K