DeBroglie Wavelength: Solving for Electrons in Relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the deBroglie wavelength for an electron accelerated to relativistic speeds by a potential V. The correct expression for the deBroglie wavelength is given by λ = h(2m0eV)^(-1/2)(1 + eV/2m0c²)^(-1/2). Participants emphasize the importance of using the relationship E² - (pc)² = (m0c²)² to avoid complications in algebraic manipulation. The initial approach using the equations eV = γm0c² and p = γm0v0 is deemed ineffective for reaching the desired result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, including energy-momentum relations.
  • Familiarity with deBroglie wavelength calculations.
  • Knowledge of relativistic mass and the Lorentz factor (γ).
  • Basic algebra and manipulation of equations in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the deBroglie wavelength in the context of relativistic particles.
  • Learn about the energy-momentum relationship in special relativity.
  • Explore the implications of relativistic speeds on mass and energy.
  • Review the concept of the Lorentz factor and its applications in relativistic physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and special relativity, as well as researchers exploring the behavior of particles at relativistic speeds.

gaobo9109
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron of charge e and rest mass m0 is accelerated to relativistic speeds by a potential V. Show that the deBroglie wavelength is given by the expression

lambda= h(2m0eV)-1/2 (1+eV/2m0c2)-1/2

The Attempt at a Solution



eV = gamma m0c2 equation one
p = gamma m0v0 equation two

From first equation, i get

v0 = (c2 - m02c4/e2v2)1/2

However, when i substitute this result into equation two, the expression is nowhere near the proposed expression.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One of the things about special relativity is that if you take the wrong approach, you can get bogged down in a bunch of algebra. I suspect that is the case here. You could probably eventually get to that final expression, but you'd be better off starting over.

Try using the fact that E2-(pc)2 = (m0c2)2, where E is the total energy of the particle.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K