Decay of Roe Meson: Conservation Laws Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter K8181
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Meson
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decay processes of rho mesons, specifically the allowed decays rho(+) → π(0)π(+) and rho(0) → π(+)π(-), versus the disallowed decay rho(0) → π(0)π(0). The primary reason for the prohibition of the latter decay is attributed to the violation of conservation laws, particularly parity. Participants noted that rho mesons are spin-1 particles with specific quark configurations that influence their decay channels, contrasting with the antiparallel configuration of pions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics fundamentals
  • Knowledge of conservation laws, specifically charge and parity
  • Familiarity with meson classifications and properties
  • Basic concepts of angular momentum and spin in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of parity in particle decays
  • Study the quark configurations of mesons, focusing on rho and pion mesons
  • Learn about conservation laws in particle physics
  • Explore angular momentum and spin in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of particle physics, educators teaching quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in meson decay processes and conservation laws.

K8181
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I just started a class in particle physics this semester, and I really need help on one of our first homework problems. We are supposed to show that while the following decays are allowed:

roe(+) --> pi(0)pi(+)
roe(-) --> pi(0)pi(-)
roe(0) --> pi(+)pi(-)

the following decay is not allowed:

roe(0) --> pi(0)pi(0)

I am pretty sure the reason is that it violates a conservation law, but I don't know which one. We have barely touched on what quantities are conserved in lecture. I can see that charge is conserved in all cases, so no problem there.

We are also told that the roe meson is a spin 1 particle, so I think that should play a role. However, the part of quantum mechanics that dealt with angular momentum and spin was a bit treacherous for me. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This all sounds pretty fishy to me... Oh perhaps you mean \rho that is rho!

You might benifit by reading This thread.
 
Fantastic! I am already familiar with LaTex.
 
For anyone reading this thread, that link was just about using LaTex for math symbols...I still REALLY need help with this problem!

:biggrin:
 
I'm not an expert in particle physics, but have you checked

1.) spin
2.) parity

I think rho mesons have both their quark and antiquark aligned, whereas pions have them antiparallel so one rho can't make two pions.
 
From what I have deduced, I think the culprit is parity. Could you explain what you know about parity? I have always found it a mysterious concept.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K