Deciding on a PhD, considering Nuclear Physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the considerations of a physics undergraduate student contemplating a PhD in nuclear physics. Participants explore the current state of nuclear physics research, job market prospects, and relevant undergraduate electives. The conversation also touches on related interests in space exploration and energy, particularly nuclear energy processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a strong interest in space exploration and energy, particularly nuclear energy processes like fusion and fission, and their applications in space.
  • Another participant questions the specific interests in space and energy, prompting a detailed response about the fascination with exploration and the limitations of current propulsion technologies.
  • A participant suggests that the original poster should engage with the Society of Physics Students (SPS) and the American Physical Society (APS) to gain insights into nuclear physics and its broader applications.
  • There is mention of various particle accelerator facilities (e.g., RHIC, ATLAS, FRIB) that conduct nuclear physics experiments, which may overlap with high energy physics, indicating a broader scope of nuclear physics than initially considered.
  • The original poster acknowledges a lack of awareness regarding the classification of certain experiments as nuclear physics and expresses interest in exploring the Division of Plasma Physics as well.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of understanding the broader scope of nuclear physics, including its overlap with high energy physics. However, there are differing views on the specific focus areas within nuclear physics and the relevance of certain research facilities.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the need for clarity on the definitions and boundaries of nuclear physics, as well as the potential overlap with other fields such as nuclear engineering and high energy physics. Some assumptions about the classification of experiments remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Undergraduate students considering a career in nuclear physics or related fields, as well as those interested in the intersections of physics with space exploration and energy applications.

TJGilb
Messages
156
Reaction score
38
Greetings to everybody. I'm currently in my 3rd year of pursuing a physics undergrad, and I'm considering where I might want to focus, what field I might want to enter. As the title suggests I'm seriously considering something with regards to nuclear physics. My primary interests lie in space (specifically the exploration thereof) and energy.

I'm curious from those more experienced, what is the state of nuclear physics in research (what might it entail these days) and the job market? I'd also like to know if there are any particular undergrad electives you recommend as preperation. Or do you have any recommendations for other areas to pursue based on those interests I outlined? Any general recommendations?

Thank you for any feedback. Honestly I'm trying to soak up every bit of advice I can right now so if you have any other input I welcome it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TJGilb said:
My primary interests lie in space (specifically the exploration thereof) and energy.
What about these interest you?
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
What about these interest you?

An excellent question. And the quick answer would be a lot, but I'll try and outline a few specifics. To quote Star Trek, space is a sort of final frontier to me in terms of unexploration. Things like missions to Europa for example have me at the edge of my seat. Plus the history (and future) of the universe is basically written up there which also fascinates me. It's honestly hard to find things that I don't find interesting. I'm also excited for the James Webb telescope. I know propulsion is one of our severe limiting factors in what we can explore in our own solar system and possibly nearby ones in the future. Experimental non-combustion propulsion interests me, for example ion thrust.

Energy has interested me ever since I took an engineering thermodynamics course, and later a thermal physics course. I'm particularly interested in nuclear energy processes both fusion and fission. I'm interested in how they work both at an atomic and macroscopic scale. I'm also interested in how we can (and in some cases do) use radioactive materials in space.

I'm sure I could go on, but this has already gotten long enough.
 
If you are a student at a US institution (you didn't say where you are), then you should already be in either a SPS at your institution, or become a student member of the APS. Now, even without that, you should have at least look at the APS website and the Division of Nuclear Physics. This is because that webpage gives you quite a broad description of what "nuclear physics" is. Your description of it missed quite a huge part of the field that is known as "Nuclear Physics".

For example, are you aware that facilities such as RHIC at BNL, ATLAS at ANL, the upcoming FRIB at Michigan State University, ALICE at LHC, and CEBAF at JLab, are all particle accelerator/collider/detector facilities that are considered to be running nuclear physics experiments? They look like high energy physics experiments on the outside.

What this means is that there's a good chance that you will be learning almost the same physics, including elementary particle physics, that HEP majors do. Nuclear physics isn't just fusion/fission, or energy. In fact, a large part of such areas of fusion/fission/energy tend to fall under nuclear engineering.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
If you are a student at a US institution (you didn't say where you are), then you should already be in either a SPS at your institution, or become a student member of the APS. Now, even without that, you should have at least look at the APS website and the Division of Nuclear Physics. This is because that webpage gives you quite a broad description of what "nuclear physics" is. Your description of it missed quite a huge part of the field that is known as "Nuclear Physics".

I assume SPS is referring to the Society of Physics Students? If so, our physics club is a member I do believe. I just signed up for a student membership with APS. I'll be keeping an eye on the Division of Nuclear Physics, and I think also the Division of Plasma Physics. At a glance I think Plasma Physics might be more in line with my interests, though I'll have to read up to be sure.

ZapperZ said:
For example, are you aware that facilities such as RHIC at BNL, ATLAS at ANL, the upcoming FRIB at Michigan State University, ALICE at LHC, and CEBAF at JLab, are all particle accelerator/collider/detector facilities that are considered to be running nuclear physics experiments? They look like high energy physics experiments on the outside.

I didn't know those would be considered Nuclear Physics experiments, even partially. I sort of assumed they fell under elementary particle physics. Very interesting.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K