I Decomposing arbitrary representations

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter StaticZero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Representations
StaticZero
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
How to split a non-simply reducible representation?
Suppose we have a group ##G = D_3## and its reducible representation ##T = E \oplus E## where ##E## is the two-dimensional irrep. In its own basis, this representation can be written like this (I provide the operator only for ##C_3^+## group element which is counter-clockwise rotation by ##2\pi/3## around ##z##)
$$
T(C_3^+) = \begin{pmatrix}
-\frac12 & -\frac{\sqrt3}2 & 0 & 0 \\
\frac{\sqrt3}{2}&-\frac12 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & -\frac12 & -\frac{\sqrt3}{2} \\
0 & 0 & \frac{\sqrt3}{2}&-\frac12
\end{pmatrix}
$$

Suppose now that we have done a basis change and forgot what was that old basis which delivered a block-diagonal form for the representation ##T##, so in our new basis all matrices of ##T## are of generic form.

How could we find a basis in which the given representation returns to block-diagonal form?

In the case of simply reducible representation (=that consists of only copies of irreps) it can be easily done by observing the character table and constructing the projector
$$
P^{(\alpha)} = \frac{s_\alpha}{|G|} \sum_g \chi^{(\alpha)}_{g'} T_g
$$
where we sum with respect to group elements and ##s_\alpha## is the dimension of the irrep ##\alpha## and ##g' \equiv g^{-1}##.

Unfortunately, this operator does not help in case of multiple copies of irreps as in the example being investigated where ##T = E \oplus E## because it can 'filter out' only those irreps that have distinct character.

Two other projectors which I can recall for
$$
P^{(\alpha)}_i = \frac{s_\alpha}{|G|} \sum_g T^{(\alpha)}_{g', ii} T_g
$$
$$
P^{(\alpha)}_{ik} = \frac{s_\alpha}{|G|} \sum_g T^{(\alpha)}_{g', ik} T_g
$$
are neither helpful, too, by the similar reasoning.

Could you please explain whether these multiple copies of the same irreps can be 'filtered out'?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this question ill-stated, am I missing something trivial or are there other problems with it?
 
If you're just interested in the case ##G=D_3##, here's a possibility: let ##r## and ##s## be the usual generators of ##D_3##, viewed as linear operators on your ##4##-dimensional representation. Then ##r-s## has a nontrivial kernel (since in the ##2##-dimensional standard representation of ##D_3,## there is vertex on an equilateral triangle where these group elements act identically). Now if ##0\neq x\in\text{ker}(r-s),## note that ##\text{Span}(x,rx)## is a ##2##-dimensional invariant subspace. Apply the usual procedure to find an invariant complement.
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top