Decrease in amplitude with distance from source

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the decrease in wave amplitude from a stone thrown into a pool of water. Initially, a participant incorrectly chose the amplitude decrease as inversely proportional to the square of the distance, referencing sound waves. Through clarification, it was established that wave energy spreads in two dimensions for water waves, leading to a different relationship. The correct answer for the amplitude decrease was determined to be inversely proportional to the square root of the distance, or 1/r1/2. The participant successfully applied this understanding on a subsequent quiz attempt.
wrongusername
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A stone is thrown into a quiet pool of water. With no fluid friction, the amplitude of the waves falls off with distance r from the impact point as:

A. 1/r3
B. 1/r
C. 1/r1/2
D. 1/r3/2
E. 1/r2

Homework Equations


I can't think of any wave function accounting for decreasing amplitude with an increasing x.

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I remembered from high school science classes that the intensity (or something similar) of a sound wave decreases inversely with the square of the distance from the source, so I chose choice E but got it wrong. I do not know what the correct answer is. Any help would be great :wink:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you remember why a sound wave decreases inversely with the square of the distance? Imagine a sound source emitting a very short pulse of sound. One second later, the sound energy will be spread across the surface of a sphere. The sphere's surface area is 4pi*r^2, so the intensity (energy per square meter) is P/(4pi*r^2).

Now, for a wave on a pond, all of the energy moves in two dimensions. So intensity is...
 
ideasrule said:
Do you remember why a sound wave decreases inversely with the square of the distance? Imagine a sound source emitting a very short pulse of sound. One second later, the sound energy will be spread across the surface of a sphere. The sphere's surface area is 4pi*r^2, so the intensity (energy per square meter) is P/(4pi*r^2).

Now, for a wave on a pond, all of the energy moves in two dimensions. So intensity is...

Oh, so that's why :smile:

I guess the answer is B then, since intensity would be P/(2pi*r). Thank you!
 
I believe that the answer is not 1/r...
 
JPizz said:
I believe that the answer is not 1/r...

Why not? Since the circumferenc of a circle is 2pi*r, and the energy of the wave would be spread out as the circle gets larger, wouldn't the intensity be Power/circumference, or P/(2pi*r)? Please enlighten me a bit.
 
I took a quiz online for school and I had put that in as an answer and it said it was wrong. Maybe the quiz I took was incorrect...
 
What you are looking for is the amplitude, not the energy. What you have said about energy is right, now you have to use the relation between energy and amplitude, do you remember it?
 
JPizz said:
I took a quiz online for school and I had put that in as an answer and it said it was wrong. Maybe the quiz I took was incorrect...

The quiz probably was correct... funny thing, I found this question on my online quizzes for school too. Coincedence? :-p Do you get a second try at the quiz too?

UgOOgU said:
What you are looking for is the amplitude, not the energy. What you have said about energy is right, now you have to use the relation between energy and amplitude, do you remember it?

A search through my book gives me
E=\frac{1}{2}\mu\omega^{2}A^{2}\lambda

I guess then, A\propto\sqrt{E}
Which leads me to answer choice C. Should that be the correct answer then?
 
Okay, I've verified that the correct answer is indeed \frac{1}{\sqrt{r}}. I had a second try on the quiz and got choice C right.

Big thanks to everyone who helped me! :smile:
 
Back
Top