Decrease in Pressure Above a Lake

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the decrease in pressure when moving 31 meters above a lake, starting with a surface pressure of 104 kPa. The correct formula to use is P = pgh, where p is the air density (1.2 kg/m³) and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²), resulting in a pressure decrease of approximately 364.56 Pa. It is clarified that atmospheric pressure does not need to be factored into this specific calculation, as the problem focuses solely on the decrease in pressure due to elevation. The importance of using given density and pressure values is emphasized, while more complex calculations involving atmospheric pressure are deemed unnecessary for this scenario. Overall, the key takeaway is that the pressure decrease is calculated independently of the atmospheric pressure at the lake's surface.
dvolpe
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the approximate decrease in pressure in going 31 m above the surface of the lake? Air at 20 degrees C has density of 1.2 kg/mcubed. The pressure at the surface of the lake is 104 kPa

Homework Equations



Pressure = F/Area
Force = density*area*height*g
Pressure = density*height*g = pgh


The Attempt at a Solution


P = 1.2 * 9.8 * 31 m = 364.56 Pa

These doesn't seem right in comparison to the surface of lake. What about atmospheric pressure? Does that need to be considered here as there is a pressure decrease?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have calculate the change in pressure from 31 meter of air, so if you start at 104 kPa and move up 31 meter, then what is the absolute pressure there?
 
Does this mean that the pressure at 31 m above lake = atm pressure + pressure on surface area of lake? How do I calculate atmospheric pressure?

So if P = Patm + Plake then isn't P atm = pgh and that is the decrease?
 
Last edited:
dvolpe said:
Does this mean that the pressure at 31 m above lake = atm pressure + pressure on surface area of lake? How do I calculate atmospheric pressure?

So if P = Patm + Plake then isn't P atm = pgh and that is the decrease?

No, the pressure at the lake surface is the atmospheric pressure (here given as 104 kPa). I can see that I probably have added some to you confusion. Given the equations you posted, you have correctly calculated the decrease in pressure going up 31 m, and this is what the problem text is asking.

You then ask if this can be correct since you are not using the 104 kPa information, and I think I probably answered something else on that, sorry. Let me try to do better: No, in the context of the problem text where the density is a given number you do not need to consider the atmospheric pressure of 104 kPa.

In case the density was not given and the pressure at the lake was significantly different from standard pressure (101.3 kPa) it would then be prudent to calculate the density given the absolute pressure and temperature of the air (for instance assuming an ideal gas). If you want to be even more accurate, there are more complex equations for calculating the atmospheric pressure based on gas theory that requires, amongst others, the surface level pressure and temperature (see for instance [1]), but I would guess that would be a fair bit of overkill in this case and the difference most likely wouldn't matter much over 31 m anyway.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barometric_formula
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top