Deduce the solution from weight function

  • Thread starter Thread starter jwxie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Weight
jwxie
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Convolution-Summation of a First Order System with Constant Coefficients

[PLAIN]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14655573/1.PNG

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The solution from the lecture
[PLAIN]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14655573/2.PNG

[PLAIN]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14655573/3.PNG

What I don't understand is how do we get 4/3 and the minus sign in the solution.

I know I can separate the summation into i = 0 to 0, and i = 1 to k. Thus, the first summation would be 1/3.
Then how did we get that 4/3? Did we just add the 1? Where did that 1 come from? From b_0 ?

How did we get the minus sign in front of the second term in the solution? Was it because we have -1/3 u(k-1) in the original equation?

Can anyone please help me with this? Thank you very much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have given

w_0 = 1,\ w_i = \left(\frac 1 6\right)\left(\frac 1 2\right)^{i-1}

So

\sum_{i=0}^{k}w_i = 1 + \sum_{i=1}^{k}w_i = 1 + \left(\frac 1 6\right)<br /> \sum_{i=1}^{k}\left(\frac 1 2\right)^{i-1}

But

\sum_{i=1}^{k}\left(\frac 1 2\right)^{i-1} = 2 - \left(\frac 1 2\right)^{k-1}

Put that in for the last sum and simplify it.
 
hi. i see that since w(0) is 1, then the summation of w(i) when i = 0, we would have 1
that's clear
the 2,... it's the summation of gemoetric series given by (1 - a^(k+1))/ 1-a, am i correct?
i get
(1 - (1/2)^k) / 1-(1/2)
which gives 2* (1- (1/2)^k)
did i do something wrong? when i distribute it the k-power term also gets the 2...
 
jwxie said:
hi. i see that since w(0) is 1, then the summation of w(i) when i = 0, we would have 1
that's clear
the 2,... it's the summation of gemoetric series given by (1 - a^(k+1))/ 1-a, am i correct?
i get
(1 - (1/2)^k) / 1-(1/2)
which gives 2* (1- (1/2)^k)
did i do something wrong? when i distribute it the k-power term also gets the 2...

So you distribute the 2 and you get 2 - (1/2)(k-1) just like I said.
 
I thought the (1/2)^(k-1) also gets the 2 after the distribution since the top is being divided by the the 1-(1/2)

(1-\frac{1}{2}^{k-1})*2

-- edited
okay. i think we are both right.
i think u missed the 2 in the previous post
and doing the simplification
1+ (1/6) * (2) * [1 - (1/2)^(k-1) ] would give the result

thanks.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top