How Many Degrees of Freedom Does an Object in 3D Space Have?

AI Thread Summary
An object in 3D space has six degrees of freedom, which include three translational movements along the x, y, and z axes, and three rotational movements around those axes. The discussion emphasizes that while some may argue for three degrees of freedom based solely on translational movement, the inclusion of rotational capabilities is crucial for a complete understanding. The context of the object's motion, such as whether it is point-like or extended, can influence the interpretation of its degrees of freedom. Degrees of freedom are defined as the number of independent ways a system can move, which does not include velocities but rather the possible positions. Overall, the concept of six degrees of freedom is essential for accurately describing the movement of rigid bodies in three-dimensional space.
e2m2a
Messages
354
Reaction score
13
I see a lot of ambiguous explanations of degrees of freedom on the web and I need clarification. Suppose there is an object in space that can move freely along either the x,y, or z axis. Do we say it has six degrees of freedom because it can move along the x-axis one way or the opposite way, and one way or the other way on the y-axis and one way or the other way on the z axis or do we just say it has 3 degrees of freedom relating to the number of axes of motion?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A zero of an axis is a pretty arbitrary choice -- so in that respect: three. However, depending on the context, six might also be a good choice (three position components, three velocity components -- and then higher order derivatives are taken care of by equations of motion).

All this for a pointlike object. For an extended object there are some more degrees of freedom (rotational).

[edit] "depending on the context" should be explained. For the physics I bow to @wrobel below. My DOF habitat is in equation solving -- xqq for possible confusion...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes SchroedingersLion
Intuitively, the degrees of freedom describe the fundamental independent ways a particle can move. All movements are superpositions of such fundamental movements.
E.g. in two dimensions, there might be two degrees of freedom, one for the x-, one for the y- direction. All other directions are superpositions of these two basic movements.
However, if you consider a pendulum in two dimensions, the same is not true. The pendulum can move in x- and in y- direction, but not independently (the x-position already defines the respective y-position). Thus, there is just one degree of freedom for the pendulum: Either the x- or the y- direction (or more conveniently the angle). That means the amount of degrees of freedom depends on the situation at hand.
 
Degrees of freedom never characterize velocities in a system. They characterize set of possible positions of the system. Formal definition is as follows. Let a system consists of ##N## mass points with radius-vectors ##\boldsymbol r_1,\ldots,\boldsymbol r_N##. Assume that this system is subordinated to the following constraints
$$\sum_{i=1}^N\Big(\boldsymbol a_{ij}(t,\boldsymbol r_1,\ldots,\boldsymbol r_N),\boldsymbol{\dot r}_i\Big)+b_j(t,\boldsymbol r_1,\ldots,\boldsymbol r_N)=0,\quad j=1,\ldots, n<3N.$$
The vectors ##\xi_j=(\boldsymbol a_{1j},\ldots, \boldsymbol a_{Nj})\in \mathbb{R}^{3N}## are linearly independent.
If the constraints are holonomic: ##f_j(t,\boldsymbol r_1,\ldots,\boldsymbol r_N)=0## then this case is reduced to the previous one by differentiation in ##t##:
$$\sum_{i=1}^N\Big(\frac{\partial f_j}{\partial \boldsymbol r_i},\boldsymbol{\dot r}_i\Big)+\frac{\partial f_j}{\partial t}=0.$$

By definition, the vector space of virtual displacements consists of vectors ##(\delta \boldsymbol r_1,\ldots,\delta\boldsymbol r_N)\in\mathbb{R}^{3N}## such that
$$\sum_{i=1}^N\Big(\boldsymbol a_{ij},\delta\boldsymbol r_i\Big)=0.$$

By definition the number of degrees of freedom equals dimension of the space of virtual displacements. It is easy to see that the number of degrees of freedom is equal to ##3N-n##
 
Thanks for the responses. There is much to ponder.
 
I'm a little surprised no one stated it specifically, but the reason objects in 3-dimensional space have 6 degrees of freedom is because there are 3 translational (e.g. X, Y, Z) and 3 rotational (e.g. Rot_X, Rot_Y, and Rot_Z) degrees of freedom. A rigid unconstrained part can translate along any axis, and also rotate about any axis.

More reading here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_degrees_of_freedom

Wikipedia.org said:
Six degrees of freedom (6DoF) refers to the freedom of movement of a rigid body in three-dimensional space. Specifically, the body is free to change position as forward/backward (surge), up/down (heave), left/right (sway) translation in three perpendicular axes, combined with changes in orientation through rotation about three perpendicular axes, often termed yaw (normal axis), pitch (transverse axis), and roll (longitudinal axis).
 
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Back
Top