I Delta fuction potential general solution

Danny Boy
Messages
48
Reaction score
3
Hi, in the book 'Introduction to Quantum Mechanics' by Griffiths, on page 71 in the section 'The Delta-Function Potential' he states that the general solution to time independent Schrodinger Equation is $$\psi(x) = Ae^{-\kappa x} + B e^{\kappa x}$$

he then notes that the first term blows up as $$x \to -\infty,$$ so we must choose $$A=0.$$ Why is it that we are rejecting a wave function that goes to infinity? Is it simply because we are looking for normalizable solutions?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For ##x<0## you must choose ##A=0## and for ##x>0## you must have ##B=0##, if ##\kappa>0##. That's indeed, because you want to have bound states in this case, leading to normalizable wave functions. Note that there may be solutions with ##\kappa \in \mathrm{i} \mathbb{R}##, leading to scattering states with energy eigenvalues in the continuum, and these wave functions are generalized eigenfunctions that are "normalizable to a ##\delta## distribution" only.
 
  • Like
Likes Danny Boy
vanhees71 said:
For ##x<0## you must choose ##A=0## and for ##x>0## you must have ##B=0##, if ##\kappa>0##. That's indeed, because you want to have bound states in this case, leading to normalizable wave functions. Note that there may be solutions with ##\kappa \in \mathrm{i} \mathbb{R}##, leading to scattering states with energy eigenvalues in the continuum, and these wave functions are generalized eigenfunctions that are "normalizable to a ##\delta## distribution" only.
So my reasoning is correct then that we want normalizable solutions hence the requirement that the wave function is bounded?
 
If you restrict yourself to the bound-state solutions, it's correct.
 
vanhees71 said:
If you restrict yourself to the bound-state solutions, it's correct.
Okay thanks. One quick question, do you maybe know why the delta function is said to have units 1/length?
 
Simple explanation: in electrodynamics when you want to write (for example) charge density function for point charge in the origin. You would write that as ρ = q \delta (x) \delta (y) \delta (z) . You will write it in that way so that ∫ \rho dV over the whole space gives you the result q. But ρ must have units coulomb per volume, but in your formula you have coulombs in q, so delta functions have units 1/length
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Danny Boy
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top