Delta function potential and Schrodinger Equation

Seriously
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have a time dependent wavefunction for inside a delta function potential well: V(x) = -a delta(x).

It reads
Psi(x,t) = (sqrt(m*a)/hbar) * exp(-m*a*abs(x)/hbar^2) * exp(-iEt/hbar)

I'm supposed to stick this back into the time dependent Schrodinger Equation and solve for E.

Taking my Psi(x,t), I found the second derivative with respect to x, and also found the time derivative. Then I plugged directly back into the time dependent Schrodinger Equation, with V(x) given as above. The problem is that I can't seem to make the delta function go away. I get
-(m*a^2)/(2*hbar^2) - a*delta(x) = E

How do I get the delta to go away? I can't just say x=0, because then the delta function is infinity.

I also tried: Plugging directly back into the time dependent Schrodinger Equation, I integrate both sides from -e to +e, where is some really small distance around x=0. Instead of using dPsi/dt, I write dPsi/dt in terms of d^2Psi/dx^2. Then I integrate both sides. The only problem with doing this, is when I integrate d^2Psi/dx^2 dx, this becomes dPsi/dx evaluated from -e to +e -- and because of the absolute value of x in Psi, this is zero. Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where you went wrong was in taking the second derivative of e^{-|x|}; it's actually a dirac delta, which cancels the other dirac deltas as you'd expect.

e^{-|x|} is continuous and non-differentiable; the first derivative is has a jump discontinuity like the step function; and the derivative of that has a singularity like the dirac delta. (What you actually get is the sum of a dirac delta and a differentiable function.) A useful fun exercise for delta functions is problem 6 from Robert Jaffe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for the reply, Rach3, I really appreciate it.

I see now that I'm not differentiating exp(-abs(x)) correctly, let alone the second derivative. But when I try to follow your instructions, I find that I'm still not comfortable with differentiating this.

Phi = exp(-abs(x))
dPhi/dx = - dabs(x)/dx exp(-abs(x))
where dabs(x)/dx = -1 for x<0, undef for x=0, +1 for x>0

Is the second derivative d2abs(x)/dx2 exp(abs(x))?
Or is it (-(dabs(x)/dx)^2 + d2abs(x)/dx2 ) exp(abs(x)) ?
Or none of the above, lol?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top