Density distribution of gas in a centrifugal field

Fin_de_Siecle
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The problem asks me to find the density of gas in a cylinder of radius R and length l rotating about its axis with angular velocity ω, there being a total of N molecules in the cylinder.

What I have done is shown as following
I choose to look this scenario in a static frame with the cylinder, which is rotating at an unchanging angular speed ω. Then we can consider the field is a centrifugal field.

Thus the energy of a particle can be written as
$$E=E_0-\frac{1}{2}m\omega ^2 r^2$$ (1)

I haven't determined E_0 yet as I'm not sure about the thermal energy of the particle and the energy caused by the centrifugal field differs with the choosing of zero potential point.

After that, I wrote the probability as
$$dP=\frac{\rho dV}{N}=\frac{\rho \cdot 2\pi rdr\cdot l}{N}$$ (2)
where ρ is what I want to find.

My goal is to convert all r and dr into E and dE and finally compare it with Boltzmann distribution
$$P(E)=C\cdot e^{-E/kT}$$ (3)
where C is a constant.

However, I have met with some problems doing this.
From (1), it can be derived
$$E=-m\omega ^2 r$$ (4)

After I plug this into (2), I find P(E) in dP=P(E)dE is always negative. Thus is cannot be compared with the Boltzmann distribution.

How can I fix this?
Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Fin_de_siecle. Welcome to Physics Forums!

Irrespective of whether the cylinder is rotating, what is the average density of the gas in the cylinder? With the cylinder rotating, the gas near the axis is going to have less than the average density (because the pressure near the axis will be lower), and the gas near the surface will have greater than the average density (because the pressure near the outside will be higher). You can use the ideal gas law in combination with a differential radial force balance to solve for how the pressure and density are varying with radius, under the constraint that the average density remains unchanged.

Chet
 
You can use LaTeX if you format them like formula[/t[/color]ex] or $$formula$[/color]$.<br /> <br /> I&#039;m not sure why you try to solve this via a particle energy.<br /> You can consider a force equilibrium at distance r (&quot;between r and r+dr&quot;). This gives a differential equation for the pressure, depending only on pressure and constants. That method is very similar to a (simplified) model of the atmosphere.
 
mfb said:
You can use LaTeX if you format them like formula[/t[/color]ex] or $$formula$[/color]$.<br /> <br /> I&#039;m not sure why you try to solve this via a particle energy.<br /> You can consider a force equilibrium at distance r (&quot;between r and r+dr&quot;). This gives a differential equation for the pressure, depending only on pressure and constants. That method is very similar to a (simplified) model of the atmosphere.
<br /> <br /> Thank you for your information on typing formulas.<br /> <br /> I think maybe the thermal fluctuation should be taken into consideration and this is a problem assigned in my statistical mechanics class. I have read the solution in Landau&#039;s Statistical Physics (P115). He just simply plugged the centrifugal potential into the Boltzmann distribution, not considering that the farther r is, the more volume it takes. I don&#039;t quite understand his solution, so I tried this.<br /> <br /> Notwithstanding, I think your strategy may derive the result of Landau&#039;s as well. I&#039;ve read a solution use the mechanic equilibrium to derive the Boltzmann distribution of atmosphere pressure rather than using the ideas in statistical mechanic.
 
Last edited:
In equilibrium, temperature will be the same everywhere. And if the system is not in equilibrium and you don't know its temperature distribution, you are lost.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top