Density Matrix for Spin 1/2 particle in a magnetic field

khfrekek92
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!

I am trying to create the density matrix for a spin-1/2 particle that is in thermal equilibrium at temperature T, and in a constant magnetic field oriented in the x-direction. This is a fairly straightforward process, but I'm getting stuck on one little part.

Before starting I need to find the energy eigenvalues (In order to find the partition function):

H=-μS⋅B=-μBσ_x

But since σ_x is an off-diagonal matrix (unlike σ_z), plugging this Hamiltonian into the Schrodinger Equation yields two equations (By letting |ψ>=(ψ1,ψ2))

Eψ1=-μBψ2
Eψ2=-μBψ1

And then solving these like normal for E gives us only one energy eigenstate for this system (with degeneracy 2):

E=μB

However, when the magnetic field was in the z direction, the z pauli spin matrix was diagonal and didn't switch the positions of ψ1 and ψ2, which gave me two energy eigenstates (±μB).

So my question is, why would a magnetic field in the x-direction NOT break the degeneracy of the energy eigenstates, while in the z-direction it does? These directions are completely arbitrary and should yield the same results, right?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have made a mistake. Your equations lead to ##E^2=(\mu B)^2##, which has two solutions.
 
Ah man such a small algebra error! That makes everything work out perfectly, duh! Thank you so much!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top