At What Depth in Fresh Water Is the Density 1% Greater Than at the Surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter srfrgrl727
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the depth at which the density of fresh water is 1% greater than at the surface. Participants express confusion over the relationship between water density and depth, with one noting that water is generally considered incompressible, meaning its density does not significantly increase with depth. There is acknowledgment that impurities in water could affect density, but the primary focus remains on the theoretical aspect of density changes. Additionally, it is suggested that any change in density with depth is likely not linear. The conversation highlights the complexities of water density in relation to depth and external factors.
srfrgrl727
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i am working on this problem and can't figure out how to go about it at what depth in fresh water is the density 1% greater than its value at the surface? i am not sure what equation to use.My answer choices are 230m, 2300m, 23,000m, or 230,000
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have an equation of the density of water as a function of depth or something like that?
 
I was under the impression that water was "incompressible"- the density does NOT increase with depth. The pressure exerted by water certainly does increas with depth- its proportional to the depth- but that's not density!
 
Yeah I am quite certain that the density doesn't increase... however realistically, the water with impurity and other stuff in it will be at a lower level--- hence having more mass...

I would suspect that the density change would not be linear.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top