Derivation of equation of motion from various forces.

Holychikenz
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is acted on by the forces as given below. Solve these equations
to find the motion of the particle in each case.

(a) F(x, t) = k(x + t2), with x = x0 and v = v0 = 0 when t = 0;
(b) F(x', t) = kx^2 x', with x = x0 and v = v0 = 0 when t = 0;
(c) F(x', t) = k(ax'+ t), with v = v0 when t = 0;
(d) F(x, x') = ax^2/x';
(e) F(x, x', t) = k(x + x't).

(a) I didn't have any trouble with as it was just a simple non homogeneous 2nd order ODE. The others to me seemed nonlinear and very difficult for some reason. I'm wondering how the variables which F is dependent on might affect the problems and if there is some method for solving these kinds of ODE's. Also my professor said that for each one to solve for x(t).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part (b) I get as far as solving for v(t), but to solve for x(t) I'm left with the integral of (1/(x^3 + x0^3)). Is very messy and ends up being tan-1(some function of x) + ln(another function of x). Because of that I can't solve for just x in terms of only t.
 
For part (b), what is F(t=0)?...If the force on the particle is proportional to the speed, and its initial speed is zero, will the particle ever actually go anywhere?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top